Best for
- "Build a Jira connector for this project"
- "Add a Slack provider following the existing pattern"
- "Create a new integration for this API"
affaan-m/ECC/skills/api-connector-builder/SKILL.md
Build a new API connector or provider by matching the target repo's existing integration pattern exactly. Use when adding one more integration without inventing a second architecture.
Decision brief
Use this when the job is to add a repo-native integration surface, not just a generic HTTP client.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/api-connector-builder"Inspect the Agent Skill "api-connector-builder" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/skills/api-connector-builder/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Inspect at least 2 existing connectors/providers and map:
"Build a Jira connector for this project"
do not invent a new integration architecture when the repo already has one
Inspect at least 2 existing connectors/providers and map:
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 81/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Use this when the job is to add a repo-native integration surface, not just a generic HTTP client.
The point is to match the host repository's pattern:
Inspect at least 2 existing connectors/providers and map:
Define only the surface the repo actually needs:
Typical slices:
The new connector should look obvious in the codebase, not imported from a different ecosystem.
providers/
existing_provider/
__init__.py
provider.py
config.py
integrations/
existing/
client.py
models.py
connector.py
src/integrations/
existing/
index.ts
client.ts
types.ts
test.ts
backend-patternsmcp-server-patternsgithub-opsAlternatives
affaan-m/ECC
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
affaan-m/ECC
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
event4u-app/agent-config
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.