github/awesome-copilot/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.md
bigquery-pipeline-audit
Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.
- Source repository stars
- 37,126
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-28
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script. Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt data, and make sure failures are visible.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit"Inspect the Agent Skill "bigquery-pipeline-audit" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?
Locate every BigQuery job trigger (client.query, loadtablefrom, extracttable, copytable, DDL/DML via query) and every external call (APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).
Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?What is the realistic worst-case call count?For each client.query, is QueryJobConfig.maximumbytesbilled set? - 02
B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES
Verify a --mode flag exists with at least dryrun and execute options.
dryrun must print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ executionexecute requires explicit confirmation for prod (--env=prod --confirm)Prod must not be the default environment - 03
C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN
Hard fail if: the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.
A single set-based query with GENERATEDATEARRAYA staging table loaded with all dates then one join queryExplicit chunks with a hard MAXCHUNKS cap - 04
D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE
For each query, check: - Partition filter is on the raw column, not DATE(ts), CAST(...), or any function that prevents pruning - No SELECT : only columns actually used downstream - Joins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped and flag any potential…
Partition filter is on the raw column, not DATE(ts), CAST(...), orNo SELECT : only columns actually used downstreamJoins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped - 05
E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY
Identify every write operation. Flag plain INSERT/append with no dedup logic.
MERGE on a deterministic key (e.g., entityid + date + modelversion)Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into finalAppend-only with a dedupe view:
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 78/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 37,126 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- github/awesome-copilot
- Skill path
- skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness
You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script. Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt data, and make sure failures are visible.
Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final). Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not rewrites.
A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?
Locate every BigQuery job trigger (client.query, load_table_from_*,
extract_table, copy_table, DDL/DML via query) and every external call
(APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).
For each, answer:
- Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
- What is the realistic worst-case call count?
- For each
client.query, isQueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billedset? For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS? - Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run? Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.
Flag immediately if:
- Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
- Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
maximum_bytes_billedis missing on anyclient.querycall
B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES
Verify a --mode flag exists with at least dry_run and execute options.
dry_runmust print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution (BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM callsexecuterequires explicit confirmation for prod (--env=prod --confirm)- Prod must not be the default environment
If missing, propose a minimal argparse patch with safe defaults.
C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN
Hard fail if: the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.
Check that date-range backfills use one of:
- A single set-based query with
GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY - A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
- Explicit chunks with a hard
MAX_CHUNKScap
Also check:
- Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without
--override)? - If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
- For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots
(
FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables). Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.
Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.
D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE
For each query, check:
- Partition filter is on the raw column, not
DATE(ts),CAST(...), or any function that prevents pruning - No
SELECT *: only columns actually used downstream - Joins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped and flag any potential many-to-many
- Expensive operations (
REGEXP,JSON_EXTRACT, UDFs) only run after partition filtering, not on full table scans
Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.
E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY
Identify every write operation. Flag plain INSERT/append with no dedup logic.
Each write should use one of:
MERGEon a deterministic key (e.g.,entity_id + date + model_version)- Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
- Append-only with a dedupe view:
QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1
Also check:
- Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
- Is the write disposition (
WRITE_TRUNCATEvsWRITE_APPEND) intentional and documented? - Is
run_idbeing used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it.run_idshould be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.
State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.
F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?
Verify:
- Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent
except: passor warn-only - Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available, slot milliseconds, and duration
- A run summary is logged or written at the end containing:
run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes run_idis present and consistent across all log lines
If run_id is missing, propose a one-line fix:
run_id = run_id or datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%dT%H%M%S')
Final
1. PASS / FAIL with specific reasons per section (A to F). 2. Patch list ordered by risk, referencing exact functions to change. 3. If FAIL: Top 3 cost risks with a rough worst-case estimate (e.g., "loop over 90 dates x 3 retries = 270 BQ jobs").
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
event4u-app/agent-config
mcp-builder
Use when building an MCP server in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK) — agent-centric tool design, input schemas, error handling, and the 10-question evaluation harness.
github/awesome-copilot
technology-stack-blueprint-generator
Comprehensive technology stack blueprint generator that analyzes codebases to create detailed architectural documentation. Automatically detects technology stacks, programming languages, and implementation patterns across multiple platforms (.NET, Java, JavaScript, React, Python). Generates configurable blueprints with version information, licensing details, usage patterns, coding conventions, and visual diagrams. Provides implementation-ready templates and maintains architectural consistency fo
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
design-review
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.