Source profileQuality 92/100

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/skills/clinical-reports/SKILL.md

clinical-reports

Create safety-bounded draft structures and run local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.

Source repository stars
31,966
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Create safety-bounded draft structures and run local deterministic checks for clinical case, diagnostic, trial, safety, and aggregate research reports. Use only with synthetic, de-identified, or aggregate inputs and verified source-fact manifests; every output requires qualified review.

Best for

  • Prepare draft reporting structures, aggregate tables, and review manifests from verified authorized facts. Route each artifact to the correct reporting guidance, preserve provenance, and stop when source support or qual…
  • This skill does not establish legal, regulatory, ethical, journal, accreditation, or institutional compliance. Its scripts check structure and internal consistency only.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill "skills/clinical-reports"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "clinical-reports" from https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/blob/e7ac42510774624f327003c95b6650e2883bc01d/skills/clinical-reports/SKILL.md at commit e7ac42510774624f327003c95b6650e2883bc01d. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Safe Drafting Workflow

    Use assets/provenancemanifesttemplate.json. Record only local record locators, field paths, verification state, verifier role, verification date, and a SHA-256 value hash. Do not duplicate source content or direct identifiers.

    Keep draftstatus unchanged.Replace null only when a verified fact ID supports the field.Preserve uncertainty and “not assessed” exactly as recorded.
  2. 02

    5. Apply the right review

    Never sign or submit on another person’s behalf.

    clinical facts and interpretations: qualified clinician for the specialty;statistical results, populations, estimands, denominators, and missingness: qualified statistician;safety coding, seriousness, causality, expectedness, and reportability: qualified safety professional;
  3. 03

    Purpose

    Prepare draft reporting structures, aggregate tables, and review manifests from verified authorized facts. Route each artifact to the correct reporting guidance, preserve provenance, and stop when source support or qualified review is missing.

    Prepare draft reporting structures, aggregate tables, and review manifests from verified authorized facts. Route each artifact to the correct reporting guidance, preserve provenance, and stop when source support or qual…This skill does not establish legal, regulatory, ethical, journal, accreditation, or institutional compliance. Its scripts check structure and internal consistency only.
  4. 04

    Non-Negotiable Boundary

    All generated artifacts must remain visibly marked:

    diagnose, recommend treatment, choose or change dosing, triage, or provide return precautions;interpret images, specimens, raw laboratory results, symptoms, or other clinical observations;invent, infer, normalize, “complete,” or silently reconcile observations, results, dates, units, denominators, causality, expectedness, seriousness, outcomes, or conclusions;
  5. 05

    Input Gate

    Proceed only when all conditions are true:

    Purpose is explicit: publication draft, diagnostic-report scaffold, trial-results manuscript, protocol reporting review, CSR draft, aggregate safety table, or aggregate research summary.Data class is allowed: synthetic, deidentified, or aggregate.Authority is documented: the requester is authorized to use the records for the stated purpose.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score92/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars31,966SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Skill path
skills/clinical-reports/SKILL.md
Commit
e7ac42510774624f327003c95b6650e2883bc01d
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Clinical Reports

Purpose

Prepare draft reporting structures, aggregate tables, and review manifests from verified authorized facts. Route each artifact to the correct reporting guidance, preserve provenance, and stop when source support or qualified review is missing.

This skill does not establish legal, regulatory, ethical, journal, accreditation, or institutional compliance. Its scripts check structure and internal consistency only.

Non-Negotiable Boundary

Never:

  • diagnose, recommend treatment, choose or change dosing, triage, or provide return precautions;
  • interpret images, specimens, raw laboratory results, symptoms, or other clinical observations;
  • invent, infer, normalize, “complete,” or silently reconcile observations, results, dates, units, denominators, causality, expectedness, seriousness, outcomes, or conclusions;
  • create an individual case safety report from patient-level narrative or decide reportability;
  • sign, attest, approve, file, transmit, submit, amend a source record, or act as a licensed clinician, pathologist, radiologist, laboratorian, safety physician, statistician, privacy officer, attorney, or regulatory professional;
  • use real PHI in examples, assets, tests, prompts, logs, or external services;
  • call an external LLM, image service, API, or another skill.

All generated artifacts must remain visibly marked:

DRAFT — NOT FOR CLINICAL USE, SIGNATURE, FILING, OR SUBMISSION. Populate only from verified authorized source records. Qualified review and sign-off are required.

If the request crosses a boundary, stop the unsafe portion. Offer a blank structured template, a source-fact manifest, or a deterministic structural check. Direct clinical or regulatory decisions to the responsible qualified professional.

Input Gate

Proceed only when all conditions are true:

  1. Purpose is explicit: publication draft, diagnostic-report scaffold, trial-results manuscript, protocol reporting review, CSR draft, aggregate safety table, or aggregate research summary.
  2. Data class is allowed: synthetic, deidentified, or aggregate.
  3. Authority is documented: the requester is authorized to use the records for the stated purpose.
  4. Local-only handling is feasible: no upload, remote API, telemetry, or credential is needed.
  5. Minimum necessary is defined: exclude fields not needed for the artifact.
  6. Provenance exists: every populated field or claim maps to one or more verified source-fact IDs.
  7. Review owner is identified: qualified clinical, statistical, safety, privacy, legal, journal, and/or regulatory review as applicable.

Do not accept raw free-text patient records when a structured source-fact manifest can be supplied. Do not copy direct identifiers into this skill’s templates or scripts.

Route Before Drafting

ArtifactPrimary routeImportant boundary
Case report for publicationCARE 2013 checklist and 2017 explanationPublication consent, privacy, journal policy, and clinical accuracy require human verification
Radiology draft scaffoldACR 2025 communication practice parameter plus modality-specific ACR materialA qualified radiologist authors findings/impression and handles nonroutine communication
Pathology draft scaffoldCurrent specimen-specific CAP Cancer Protocol, if applicableA qualified pathologist selects the protocol/version and authors diagnosis
Laboratory draft scaffold42 CFR 493.1291 and laboratory policyThe performing laboratory controls results, reference intervals, corrections, and release
Randomized-trial results reportCONSORT 2025 plus every applicable current extensionCONSORT is reporting guidance, not a conduct or submission standard
Randomized-trial protocol reportSPIRIT 2025 plus applicable extensionsSPIRIT is for protocols, not results or CSRs
Clinical Study ReportICH E3 plus E3 Q&A; consider ICH E6(R3) and regional requirementsE3 is adaptable guidance, not a rigid universal template
Pre-approval safety reportICH E2A; E2B(R3) for electronic ICSR data; applicable regional law/guidanceQualified sponsor/investigator safety assessment controls reportability and timing
Post-approval individual safety reportICH E2D(R1), E2B(R3), and regional requirementsDo not automate case assessment, coding, or submission
Aggregate safety presentationProtocol/SAP, ICH E3, CONSORT Harms, and applicable FDA/ICH guidanceAggregate tables never determine individual-case reportability
Aggregate research summaryStudy-design-specific reporting guideline and source protocol/SAPState population, estimand, denominator, missingness, and limitations exactly as verified

Read references/report_type_routing.md before choosing a route. Use the dated primary-source ledger in references/sources.md; check the live official source when requirements could have changed.

Safe Drafting Workflow

1. Create a source-fact manifest

Use assets/provenance_manifest_template.json. Record only local record locators, field paths, verification state, verifier role, verification date, and a SHA-256 value hash. Do not duplicate source content or direct identifiers.

Every draft claim or populated field must cite one or more fact IDs. Unsupported content remains null or missing; never replace it with plausible text.

2. Generate the correct template

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/generate_report_template.py --list
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/generate_report_template.py \
  --type case-report \
  --output ./case-report-draft.json

The generator copies a fail-closed JSON template. It does not populate clinical content, create directories, overwrite files by default, or certify readiness.

3. Populate verified fields only

  • Keep draft_status unchanged.
  • Replace null only when a verified fact ID supports the field.
  • Preserve uncertainty and “not assessed” exactly as recorded.
  • Do not translate a raw observation into a diagnosis, code, grade, stage, seriousness, causality, expectedness, or recommendation.
  • Use not_applicable_with_rationale only when a qualified reviewer supplied the rationale.
  • Keep source record and draft separate.

4. Run deterministic checks

CARE structure:

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/validate_case_report.py \
  ./case-report-draft.json

ICH E3, CONSORT 2025, or SPIRIT 2025 structure:

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/validate_trial_report.py \
  ./trial-report-manifest.json

Aggregate adverse-event table:

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/format_adverse_events.py \
  ./aggregate-ae.csv --metadata ./safety-aggregate.json \
  --output ./aggregate-ae-table.md

Terminology schema:

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/terminology_validator.py \
  ./terminology-manifest.json

De-identification process documentation:

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/check_deidentification.py \
  ./deidentification-process.json

Traceability and consistency:

PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/provenance_validator.py ./provenance.json
PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 python3 scripts/consistency_checker.py ./consistency.json

These tools use the Python standard library, local bounded files, and no network, dynamic evaluation, serialization code execution, or patient-record extraction. A successful result still says review is required.

5. Apply the right review

At minimum:

  • clinical facts and interpretations: qualified clinician for the specialty;
  • statistical results, populations, estimands, denominators, and missingness: qualified statistician;
  • safety coding, seriousness, causality, expectedness, and reportability: qualified safety professional;
  • HIPAA, consent, authorization, and disclosure: privacy/legal/institutional review;
  • CSR or regulatory safety output: sponsor regulatory and medical review;
  • publication: all accountable authors and target-journal checks.

Never sign or submit on another person’s behalf.

Case Reports

Use assets/case_report_template.json and references/case_report_guidelines.md.

  • CARE’s current core checklist remains the 2013 checklist.
  • Report only what the verified record supports.
  • Do not turn a case into clinical advice or generalize causality from one case.
  • Patient perspective and informed-consent status must be recorded accurately; do not draft a false consent statement.
  • De-identification and consent are separate controls. Consent does not erase privacy risk.

Diagnostic Report Scaffolds

Use the radiology, pathology, or laboratory JSON asset and references/diagnostic_reports_standards.md.

  • The assets are field maps, not diagnostic authoring systems.
  • Never generate findings, impressions, diagnoses, grades, stages, reference intervals, critical thresholds, or follow-up recommendations.
  • Preserve preliminary/final/corrected status and source-system version.
  • Use current, exact CAP protocol and version for the specimen; do not maintain a generic cancer staging default.
  • Communication and correction actions remain with the responsible clinical service.

The former SOAP, H&P, consultation, and discharge-summary interfaces were removed. Do not recreate patient-care notes, medication plans, triage instructions, billing support, or disposition advice.

Trial, CSR, and Safety Reporting

Read references/clinical_trial_reporting.md and references/safety_reporting.md.

  • CONSORT 2025 has 30 minimum items for randomized-trial results; select relevant extensions from the current official catalogue.
  • SPIRIT 2025 has 34 minimum items for randomized-trial protocols and supersedes SPIRIT 2013.
  • ICH E3 remains the CSR basis; its 2012 Q&A explicitly permits justified adaptation.
  • ICH E6(R3) consolidated Principles, Annex 1, and Annex 2 were adopted on 16 June 2026; regional implementation can differ.
  • Distinguish seriousness from severity and an adverse event from a suspected adverse reaction.
  • ICH E2B(R3) defines electronic ICSR data/message structure; it is not an aggregate-table format or a reportability decision rule.
  • ICH E2D(R1), adopted 15 September 2025, addresses post-approval individual case safety reporting; aggregate periodic reporting is addressed separately.
  • FDA requirements and electronic submission routes are role-, product-, study-, and date-specific. This skill never files or transmits.

Privacy

Read references/privacy_and_deidentification.md.

  • Handle only the minimum necessary data locally.
  • HHS recognizes Safe Harbor and Expert Determination under 45 CFR 164.514(b).
  • Safe Harbor also requires no actual knowledge that remaining information can identify an individual.
  • Expert Determination must be performed and documented by an appropriately qualified expert.
  • A checklist or pattern scan cannot establish de-identification or HIPAA compliance.
  • Rare conditions, small cells, dates, free text, images, metadata, and combinations of quasi-identifiers can retain re-identification risk.

Assets

All assets contain synthetic schemas only and start blocked:

  • assets/case_report_template.json
  • assets/radiology_report_template.json
  • assets/pathology_report_template.json
  • assets/lab_report_template.json
  • assets/clinical_trial_csr_template.json
  • assets/clinical_trial_results_template.json
  • assets/trial_protocol_reporting_checklist.json
  • assets/clinical_trial_safety_aggregate_template.json
  • assets/adverse_event_aggregate_input_template.csv
  • assets/research_summary_template.json
  • assets/deidentification_process_checklist.json
  • assets/quality_review_checklist.json
  • assets/provenance_manifest_template.json
  • assets/terminology_manifest_template.json
  • assets/consistency_manifest_template.json

References

  • references/README.md — safe use and file map
  • references/report_type_routing.md — artifact-to-guidance routing
  • references/case_report_guidelines.md — CARE structure and publication safeguards
  • references/diagnostic_reports_standards.md — ACR, CAP, and CLIA boundaries
  • references/clinical_trial_reporting.md — CONSORT 2025, SPIRIT 2025, ICH E3/E6(R3)
  • references/safety_reporting.md — ICH E2/FDA safety distinctions
  • references/privacy_and_deidentification.md — HHS methods and limitations
  • references/medical_terminology.md — versioned terminology and schema checks
  • references/data_presentation.md — denominators, units, missingness, and aggregate tables
  • references/professional_review.md — ethics, accountability, and sign-off
  • references/sources.md — official source ledger, checked 2026-07-23

Final Handoff

State:

  1. artifact type and exact guidance/version used;
  2. allowed data class and local-only handling;
  3. unresolved null, missing, conflicts, and unsupported claims;
  4. provenance and deterministic-check results;
  5. required qualified reviewers;
  6. the draft/non-submission warning.

Never say “compliant,” “HIPAA-safe,” “validated clinically,” “approved,” “ready to file,” or “ready to submit.”

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10042,015

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

ab-testing

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

Computed 10042,015

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

churn-prevention

When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o

Computed 997

event4u-app/agent-config

design-review

Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.

Computed 9831,966

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

dask

Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.