Source profileQuality 92/100

github/awesome-copilot/skills/competitor-ad-intelligence/SKILL.md

competitor-ad-intelligence

Use this skill when the user asks to analyze, tear down, or reverse-engineer a competitor's paid ads. Trigger for prompts like "what ads is [competitor] running", "tear down their ad strategy", "competitor ad analysis", "find ad angles we haven't tried", or "reverse-engineer their paid funnel". Do not trigger for organic/SEO competitor research or website positioning analysis.

Source repository stars
37,126
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Scrape competitor ads from Meta and Google, analyze creative patterns, reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a full strategic teardown — hooks, formats, positioning bets, vulnerabilities, and counter-plays.

Best for

  • "What ads are my competitors running?"
  • "Tear down [competitor]'s ad strategy"
  • "Find new creative angles for our paid campaigns"

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/competitor-ad-intelligence"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "competitor-ad-intelligence" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/competitor-ad-intelligence/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Phase 0: Intake

    1. Competitor names + domains (e.g., apollo.io, clay.run) 2. Your product/domain — for comparison framing 3. Channels: Meta only, Google only, or both? (default: both) 4. Depth level: - Standard: Ad scrape + creative analysis + landing page analysis - Deep: Standard + historical…

    Competitor names + domains (e.g., apollo.io, clay.run)Your product/domain — for comparison framingChannels: Meta only, Google only, or both? (default: both)
  2. 02

    Phase 1: Scrape Meta Ads

    For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Meta Ad Library.

    Ad copy (headline + primary text)Visual type (image / video / carousel)CTA button text
  3. 03

    Phase 2: Scrape Google Ads

    For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Google Ads Transparency Center.

    Headline variants (up to 3)Description linesAd type (Search / Display / YouTube / Shopping)
  4. 04

    Phase 3: Analyze Creative Patterns

    After collecting all ads, perform structured analysis.

    Urgency: "Start free", "Try now", "Get started today"Low-friction: "See how it works", "Watch demo", "Learn more"Outcome: "Book a demo", "Get your free audit", "Calculate your ROI"
  5. 05

    Phase 4: Landing Page & Funnel Analysis

    For each unique landing page URL found in ads, fetch and analyze:

    Hero headline — Does it match the ad promise?Subheadline — Value prop expansionPrimary CTA — What action are they driving? (Demo / Free trial / Sign up / Download)

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score92/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars37,126SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
github/awesome-copilot
Skill path
skills/competitor-ad-intelligence/SKILL.md
Commit
9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Competitor Ad Intelligence

Scrape competitor ads from Meta and Google, analyze creative patterns, reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a full strategic teardown — hooks, formats, positioning bets, vulnerabilities, and counter-plays.

Core principle: A competitor's ad portfolio is a window into their growth strategy. Long-running ads reveal what converts. New ads reveal what they're testing. Landing pages reveal their positioning bets. The best ad creative teams start with evidence from what's already working, then differentiate.

When to Use

  • "What ads are my competitors running?"
  • "Tear down [competitor]'s ad strategy"
  • "Find new creative angles for our paid campaigns"
  • "Reverse-engineer [competitor]'s paid funnel"
  • "What hooks are working in [our space]?"
  • "Audit the ad landscape before we launch"
  • "Find weaknesses in [competitor]'s ad strategy"
  • "What format — video, image, carousel — is dominant in our category?"

Phase 0: Intake

Gather from the user:

  1. Competitor names + domains (e.g., apollo.io, clay.run)
  2. Your product/domain — for comparison framing
  3. Channels: Meta only, Google only, or both? (default: both)
  4. Depth level:
    • Standard: Ad scrape + creative analysis + landing page analysis
    • Deep: Standard + historical comparison + funnel reconstruction + counter-plays
  5. Product category — helps frame analysis
  6. Known competitor landing pages? — any URLs already spotted in their ads

Phase 1: Scrape Meta Ads

For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Meta Ad Library.

Use web_search to find competitor ads in the Meta Ad Library (publicly accessible, no API key needed):

web_search: site:facebook.com/ads/library "[competitor_name]"
web_search: "[competitor_name]" Meta Ad Library active ads
web_search: "[competitor_name]" facebook ads examples

You can also visit the Meta Ad Library directly: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=active&ad_type=all&country=US&q=<competitor_name>

Use fetch_webpage on the Ad Library URL to extract ad details if your agent supports it.

Note: Apify actors for Meta Ad Library scraping exist but are unreliable as of April 2026 due to Meta's anti-scraping measures. Use web_search as the primary method.

Collect per ad:

  • Ad copy (headline + primary text)
  • Visual type (image / video / carousel)
  • CTA button text
  • Landing page URL
  • Active duration (first seen, still running or stopped)
  • Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Audience Network)
  • Ad variations (A/B tests — same landing page, different creative)

Phase 2: Scrape Google Ads

For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Google Ads Transparency Center.

Use web_search to find competitor ads in Google Ads Transparency Center (publicly accessible):

web_search: site:adstransparency.google.com "[competitor_name]"
web_search: "[competitor_name]" Google Ads transparency
web_search: "[competitor_name]" google search ads examples

You can also visit directly: https://adstransparency.google.com/?search_text=<competitor_name>

Use fetch_webpage on the Transparency Center URL to extract ad details if your agent supports it.

Collect per ad:

  • Headline variants (up to 3)
  • Description lines
  • Ad type (Search / Display / YouTube / Shopping)
  • Landing page URL
  • Geographic targeting (if visible)

Phase 3: Analyze Creative Patterns

After collecting all ads, perform structured analysis.

Hook Pattern Clustering

Group all ad headlines/openers by hook type:

Hook TypePatternExample
Fear/LossRisk of missing out or falling behind"Your competitors are already using AI SDRs"
OutcomeDirect result promise"10x your pipeline in 30 days"
QuestionChallenges current assumption"Still doing outbound manually?"
Social proofNames customers or numbers"Join 500+ B2B teams using [product]"
ContrarianChallenges conventional wisdom"Cold email isn't dead. Your copy is."
EmpathyValidates their pain"We know SDR ramp time is brutal"
Product-ledFeature as hook"[Feature] is live — see what's new"

Count how many ads per competitor use each hook type. This reveals their primary messaging strategy.

Format Distribution

FormatMetaGoogle
Static image[N]N/A
Video[N][N]
Carousel[N]N/A
Search textN/A[N]
Display bannerN/A[N]

CTA Taxonomy

List all unique CTAs found. Common patterns:

  • Urgency: "Start free", "Try now", "Get started today"
  • Low-friction: "See how it works", "Watch demo", "Learn more"
  • Outcome: "Book a demo", "Get your free audit", "Calculate your ROI"

Phase 4: Landing Page & Funnel Analysis

For each unique landing page URL found in ads, fetch and analyze:

fetch_webpage: [landing_page_url]

Or use curl if fetch_webpage is unavailable.

Extract per landing page:

  • Hero headline — Does it match the ad promise?
  • Subheadline — Value prop expansion
  • Primary CTA — What action are they driving? (Demo / Free trial / Sign up / Download)
  • Social proof — Logos, testimonials, case study metrics
  • Pricing visibility — Is pricing shown or hidden?
  • Form fields — How much info do they ask for?
  • Page type — General homepage / dedicated LP / feature page / use-case page
  • Message match score — How well does the LP deliver on the ad's promise? (1-10)

Campaign Clustering

Group all ads into logical campaigns by:

  • Landing page destination — Ads pointing to the same URL = same campaign
  • Messaging theme — Similar copy angles = same strategic bet
  • Audience signal — Different copy for different personas

Per-Campaign Funnel Analysis

For each campaign cluster:

DimensionAnalysis
Strategic intentWhat is this campaign trying to achieve? (Awareness / Lead gen / Free trial / Competitive displacement)
Target personaWho is this ad speaking to? (Role, pain, stage)
Positioning betWhat market position are they claiming?
Hook strategyFear / Outcome / Social proof / Contrarian / Product-led
Conversion pathAd → LP → CTA → [Demo call / Free trial / Content download]
Longevity signalHow long has this been running? (Longer = likely working)
A/B tests detectedMultiple creatives to same LP = active testing

Budget Allocation Inference

Based on ad volume and platform distribution, estimate where they're concentrating spend:

PlatformAd Count% of TotalEstimated Focus
Meta (Facebook)[N][X%][Awareness / Retargeting]
Meta (Instagram)[N][X%][Visual / younger audience]
Google Search[N][X%][Bottom-funnel capture]
Google Display[N][X%][Awareness / retargeting]
YouTube[N][X%][Education / awareness]

Phase 5: Strategic Analysis

Creative Gap Analysis

Identify across all competitors:

  1. Angles nobody is running — Hook types absent from competitor ads = white space
  2. Overcrowded angles — If everyone leads with "save time", avoid it or be more specific
  3. Format opportunities — If no one is running video in your space, it may stand out
  4. Underutilized proof — Are competitors avoiding specific proof points you could own?
  5. CTA patterns to test — What CTAs do the longest-running ads use?

Vulnerability Analysis

Identify weaknesses in each competitor's ad strategy:

Vulnerability TypeDescription
Message-LP mismatchAd promises one thing, LP delivers another
Single-persona dependencyAll ads target the same persona — missing segments
Platform concentrationHeavy on one platform, absent from others
No social proofAds or LPs lack credibility markers
Weak CTAAsking for too much too soon (demo before value)
Generic positioningClaims anyone could make — not differentiated
Stale creativeSame ads running unchanged for months — fatigue risk

Historical Comparison (Deep Mode)

If Web Archive data exists for their landing pages:

  • Has their positioning changed in the last 6-12 months?
  • What campaigns did they retire? (Possible losers)
  • What campaigns have they scaled up? (Possible winners)

Phase 6: Output

# Competitor Ad Intelligence Report — [DATE]

## Coverage
- Competitors analyzed: [list]
- Meta ads collected: [N]
- Google ads collected: [N]
- Unique landing pages analyzed: [N]
- Estimated active campaigns: [N]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentence summary: What is the competitive ad landscape? What's working? Where are the gaps and vulnerabilities?]

---

## Meta Ad Analysis

### Hook Distribution
| Hook Type | [Comp1] | [Comp2] | [Comp3] |
|-----------|---------|---------|---------|
| Fear/Loss | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| Outcome | 30% | 50% | 60% |
...

### Top Performing Ads (Longest Running)
**[Competitor] — [Ad Title/Hook]**
> [Ad copy excerpt]
- Format: [type]
- CTA: [text]
- Running since: [date]
- Why it likely works: [analysis]

---

## Google Ad Analysis

### Headline Patterns
[Top headline structures with examples]

### Most Common CTAs
[ranked list]

---

## Campaign Breakdown

### Campaign 1: [Inferred Campaign Name]
- **Competitor:** [name]
- **Ads in cluster:** [N]
- **Platform(s):** [Meta / Google / Both]
- **Strategic intent:** [Awareness / Lead gen / Competitive displacement / etc.]
- **Target persona:** [Description]
- **Hook strategy:** [Type]
- **Landing page:** [URL]
  - Hero: "[Headline text]"
  - CTA: "[Button text]"
  - Message match: [Score/10]
- **Longevity:** [First seen date → status]
- **A/B tests detected:** [Yes/No — what they're testing]

**Sample ad:**
> **Headline:** [text]
> **Body:** [text]
> **CTA:** [button]
> **Format:** [Image/Video/Carousel]

**Assessment:** [1-2 sentences — is this working? Why/why not?]

### Campaign 2: ...

---

## Funnel Map

[Ad: Hook/Angle] → [LP: /landing-page-url] → [CTA: Book Demo] ↓ [Ad: Different angle] → [LP: /same-or-different] → [CTA: Free Trial]


---

## Budget Allocation Estimate

| Platform | Share | Focus Area |
|----------|-------|-----------|
| [Platform] | [X%] | [Intent] |

---

## Creative Gap Analysis

### Angles Nobody Is Running
1. [Angle] — Why it could work for you: [reasoning]
2. [Angle] — ...

### Overcrowded Angles (Avoid or Differentiate)
- [Angle] — [N] of [N] competitors use this

### Format White Space
- [Format] is not being used by competitors on [platform]

---

## Vulnerability Report

### 1. [Vulnerability]
**Competitor:** [name]
**Evidence:** [What we observed]
**Your opportunity:** [How to exploit this gap]

### 2. ...

---

## Recommended Counter-Plays

### Counter-Play 1: [Name]
- **Target their weakness:** [Which vulnerability]
- **Your ad angle:** [Hook]
- **Platform:** [Where to run]
- **Proposed headline:** "[headline]"
- **Proposed body:** "[copy]"
- **LP strategy:** [What your landing page should emphasize]
- **Why test this:** [rationale]

### Counter-Play 2: ...

Cost

ComponentCost
Ad library research (web_search)Free
Landing page fetchingFree
Web Archive lookup (deep mode)Free
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree

Environment Variables

  • No API keys required. This skill uses publicly accessible ad libraries and web search.

Tools Used

  • web_search — query Meta Ad Library and Google Ads Transparency Center
  • fetch_webpage or curl — fetch and analyze landing pages

Trigger Phrases

  • "What ads are [competitor] running?"
  • "Tear down [competitor]'s ad strategy"
  • "Audit the ad landscape for [product category]"
  • "Run ad intelligence for [competitors]"
  • "Find new paid ad angles we haven't tried"
  • "Reverse-engineer [competitor]'s paid funnel"
  • "Find weaknesses in [competitor]'s ad strategy"
  • "Deep competitive ad analysis on [competitor]"

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9327

MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli

off-page-seo

Backlink + distribution checklist that expands a site's KD ceiling beyond what on-page work alone can earn. Use when the user mentions 'backlinks', 'off-page SEO', 'directory submissions', 'guest posts', 'outreach targets', 'link building', 'submit to directories', 'get listed in listicles', 'Product Hunt launch backlinks', or asks 'how do I get more domain authority'. Generates a prioritized, researched target list across directories, listicles, and guest-post candidates — does NOT submit anyth

Computed 9227

MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli

seo-machine

Build an organic-traffic operating system for any site or app: a multi-phase, resumable engine that ships programmatic landing pages (alternatives, comparisons, use-cases, playbooks) on top of real keyword research. Use when the user says 'SEO machine', 'build organic traffic', 'rank on Google', 'we need traffic', 'alternatives pages', 'comparison pages', '/for/ pages', 'programmatic SEO', or 'build an SEO engine'. Distinct from `seo-audit` (one-off diagnostic) and `seo-content` (single-article

Computed 9027

MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli

competitor-alternatives

Creates high-converting 'X vs Y' and 'X alternatives' SEO pages that capture comparison search traffic. Researches competitors, writes honest comparison content, and adds schema markup (FAQPage, ItemList). Use when someone needs alternatives pages, comparison content, or says 'alternatives page', 'vs page', 'comparison', 'competitor alternatives', 'X vs Y page', or wants to capture competitor brand search traffic with SEO content. Also trigger when someone wants to rank for competitor brand name

Computed 9027

MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli

keyword-research

Strategic keyword research powered by web search and brand context. Use this skill whenever the user mentions keywords, keyword research, SEO topics, content topics, 'what should I write about', content strategy, blog ideas, search traffic, or content planning. Also trigger when the user wants to plan what content to create, when existing content isn't attracting search traffic, when any skill needs keyword-plan.md but it doesn't exist, or when the user asks about SEO in the context of content c