Source profileQuality 84/100

affaan-m/ECC/skills/context-budget/SKILL.md

context-budget

Audits Claude Code context window consumption across agents, skills, MCP servers, and rules. Identifies bloat, redundant components, and produces prioritized token-savings recommendations.

Source repository stars
234,327
Declared platforms
1
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-27
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Analyze token overhead across every loaded component in a Claude Code session and surface actionable optimizations to reclaim context space.

Best for

  • Session performance feels sluggish or output quality is degrading
  • You've recently added many skills, agents, or MCP servers
  • You want to know how much context headroom you actually have

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeDeclaredSource recordInstall path and trigger
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/context-budget"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "context-budget" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/skills/context-budget/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Phase 1: Inventory

    Scan all component directories and estimate token consumption:

    Count lines and tokens per file (words × 1.3)Extract description frontmatter lengthFlag: files 200 lines (heavy), description 30 words (bloated frontmatter)
  2. 02

    Phase 2: Classify

    Sort every component into a bucket:

    Sort every component into a bucket:
  3. 03

    Phase 3: Detect Issues

    Identify the following problem patterns:

    Bloated agent descriptions — description 30 words in frontmatter loads into every Task tool invocationHeavy agents — files 200 lines inflate Task tool context on every spawnRedundant components — skills that duplicate agent logic, rules that duplicate CLAUDE.md
  4. 04

    Phase 4: Report

    Produce the context budget report:

    Produce the context budget report:In verbose mode, additionally output per-file token counts, line-by-line breakdown of the heaviest files, specific redundant lines between overlapping components, and MCP tool list with per-tool schema size estimates.
  5. 05

    When to Use

    Session performance feels sluggish or output quality is degrading

    Session performance feels sluggish or output quality is degradingYou've recently added many skills, agents, or MCP serversYou want to know how much context headroom you actually have

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score84/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars234,327SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility1 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Skill path
skills/context-budget/SKILL.md
Commit
4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Context Budget

Analyze token overhead across every loaded component in a Claude Code session and surface actionable optimizations to reclaim context space.

When to Use

  • Session performance feels sluggish or output quality is degrading
  • You've recently added many skills, agents, or MCP servers
  • You want to know how much context headroom you actually have
  • Planning to add more components and need to know if there's room
  • Running /context-budget command (this skill backs it)

How It Works

Phase 1: Inventory

Scan all component directories and estimate token consumption:

Agents (agents/*.md)

  • Count lines and tokens per file (words × 1.3)
  • Extract description frontmatter length
  • Flag: files >200 lines (heavy), description >30 words (bloated frontmatter)

Skills (skills/*/SKILL.md)

  • Count tokens per SKILL.md
  • Flag: files >400 lines
  • Check for duplicate copies in .agents/skills/ — skip identical copies to avoid double-counting

Rules (rules/**/*.md)

  • Count tokens per file
  • Flag: files >100 lines
  • Detect content overlap between rule files in the same language module

MCP Servers (.mcp.json or active MCP config)

  • Count configured servers and total tool count
  • Estimate schema overhead at ~500 tokens per tool
  • Flag: servers with >20 tools, servers that wrap simple CLI commands (gh, git, npm, supabase, vercel)

CLAUDE.md (project + user-level)

  • Count tokens per file in the CLAUDE.md chain
  • Flag: combined total >300 lines

Phase 2: Classify

Sort every component into a bucket:

BucketCriteriaAction
Always neededReferenced in CLAUDE.md, backs an active command, or matches current project typeKeep
Sometimes neededDomain-specific (e.g. language patterns), not referenced in CLAUDE.mdConsider on-demand activation
Rarely neededNo command reference, overlapping content, or no obvious project matchRemove or lazy-load

Phase 3: Detect Issues

Identify the following problem patterns:

  • Bloated agent descriptions — description >30 words in frontmatter loads into every Task tool invocation
  • Heavy agents — files >200 lines inflate Task tool context on every spawn
  • Redundant components — skills that duplicate agent logic, rules that duplicate CLAUDE.md
  • MCP over-subscription — >10 servers, or servers wrapping CLI tools available for free
  • CLAUDE.md bloat — verbose explanations, outdated sections, instructions that should be rules

Phase 4: Report

Produce the context budget report:

Context Budget Report
═══════════════════════════════════════

Total estimated overhead: ~XX,XXX tokens
Context model: Claude Sonnet (200K window)
Effective available context: ~XXX,XXX tokens (XX%)

Component Breakdown:
┌─────────────────┬────────┬───────────┐
│ Component       │ Count  │ Tokens    │
├─────────────────┼────────┼───────────┤
│ Agents          │ N      │ ~X,XXX    │
│ Skills          │ N      │ ~X,XXX    │
│ Rules           │ N      │ ~X,XXX    │
│ MCP tools       │ N      │ ~XX,XXX   │
│ CLAUDE.md       │ N      │ ~X,XXX    │
└─────────────────┴────────┴───────────┘

WARNING: Issues Found (N):
[ranked by token savings]

Top 3 Optimizations:
1. [action] → save ~X,XXX tokens
2. [action] → save ~X,XXX tokens
3. [action] → save ~X,XXX tokens

Potential savings: ~XX,XXX tokens (XX% of current overhead)

In verbose mode, additionally output per-file token counts, line-by-line breakdown of the heaviest files, specific redundant lines between overlapping components, and MCP tool list with per-tool schema size estimates.

Examples

Basic audit

User: /context-budget
Skill: Scans setup → 16 agents (12,400 tokens), 28 skills (6,200), 87 MCP tools (43,500), 2 CLAUDE.md (1,200)
       Flags: 3 heavy agents, 14 MCP servers (3 CLI-replaceable)
       Top saving: remove 3 MCP servers → -27,500 tokens (47% overhead reduction)

Verbose mode

User: /context-budget --verbose
Skill: Full report + per-file breakdown showing planner.md (213 lines, 1,840 tokens),
       MCP tool list with per-tool sizes, duplicated rule lines side by side

Pre-expansion check

User: I want to add 5 more MCP servers, do I have room?
Skill: Current overhead 33% → adding 5 servers (~50 tools) would add ~25,000 tokens → pushes to 45% overhead
       Recommendation: remove 2 CLI-replaceable servers first to stay under 40%

Best Practices

  • Token estimation: use words × 1.3 for prose, chars / 4 for code-heavy files
  • MCP is the biggest lever: each tool schema costs ~500 tokens; a 30-tool server costs more than all your skills combined
  • Agent descriptions are loaded always: even if the agent is never invoked, its description field is present in every Task tool context
  • Verbose mode for debugging: use when you need to pinpoint the exact files driving overhead, not for regular audits
  • Audit after changes: run after adding any agent, skill, or MCP server to catch creep early

Alternatives

Compare before choosing