Source profileQuality 89/100Review permissions

github/awesome-copilot/skills/copilot-pr-autopilot/SKILL.md

copilot-pr-autopilot

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re

Source repository stars
37,126
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
2
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Drive any GitHub pull request through repeated rounds of Copilot code review until the agent has done its job — every Copilot finding has a reply from the agent (fix-acknowledgement, decline-with-rationale, or explicit escalate-to-user hand-off). Remaining open threads, if any,…

Best for

  • The user asks to "request Copilot review" or "run a Copilot review loop"
  • A PR is functionally complete and the user wants a final correctness pass
  • A previous Copilot review on the PR has left open threads that need

Not for

  • The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable;
  • The user wants human reviewer feedback, not Copilot's.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/copilot-pr-autopilot"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "copilot-pr-autopilot" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/copilot-pr-autopilot/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Step-by-Step Workflow

    The loop: steps 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9, then back to step 1 if Converged: false. Repeat the 1→9 round until step 9 returns Converged: true; only then run step 10 once and call taskcomplete. At every 10th round, the parent runs the round-cap recap gate before looping b…

    Request review (parent) — see 01-request-review.mdWait for review (sub-agent, 20-min cap) — see 02-wait.mdList + categorize open threads (sub-agent, 5 min) — see 03-list-threads.md
  2. 02

    When to Use This Skill

    The user asks to "request Copilot review" or "run a Copilot review loop"

    The user asks to "request Copilot review" or "run a Copilot review loop"A PR is functionally complete and the user wants a final correctness passA previous Copilot review on the PR has left open threads that need
  3. 03

    When NOT to Use This Skill

    The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable;

    The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable;The user wants human reviewer feedback, not Copilot's.- The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable; otherwise findings churn round-over-round. - The user wants human reviewer feedback, not Copilot's.
  4. 04

    Prerequisites

    The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs Triage or Write permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (requestReviewsByLogin) is gated on that permission. Verified against the public REST + GraphQL surface…

    gh CLI installed and authenticated against the target repository.PowerShell on PATH — Windows PowerShell 5.1+ (powershell.exe) orCopilot Code Review is the primary use case (01-request-review.ps1
  5. 05

    Permissions: who can run the full loop

    The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs Triage or Write permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (requestReviewsByLogin) is gated on that permission. Verified against the public REST + GraphQL surface…

    The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs Triage or Write permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (requestReviewsByLogin) is gated on that pe…In single-iteration mode the loop's convergence boolean is Converged: true iff OpenThreadsAwaitingReply == 0 (the agent's side is done). The maintainer-side re-trigger then drives any additional rounds.Every script dot-sources scripts/lib.ps1 which runs Assert-GhReady on load: if gh is missing OR gh auth status fails, the script halts before any work with a single actionable error message naming the install command an…

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Runs scripts

medium · line 9

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

Copilot Code Review enabled, run from a machine with `gh` CLI

Writes files

medium · line 45

The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.

The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs **Triage or Write** permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (`requestReviewsByLogin`) is gated on that permission. Verif

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score89/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars37,126SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
github/awesome-copilot
Skill path
skills/copilot-pr-autopilot/SKILL.md
Commit
9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Copilot PR Autopilot

Drive any GitHub pull request through repeated rounds of Copilot code review until the agent has done its job — every Copilot finding has a reply from the agent (fix-acknowledgement, decline-with-rationale, or explicit escalate-to-user hand-off). Remaining open threads, if any, are deliberate hand-offs to the human merge owner — they're not loop failures. Repository-agnostic — works on any repo that has Copilot Code Review enabled, run from a machine with gh CLI installed and authenticated (see Prerequisites).

When to Use This Skill

  • The user asks to "request Copilot review" or "run a Copilot review loop" on a PR.
  • A PR is functionally complete and the user wants a final correctness pass via repeated automated review rounds.
  • A previous Copilot review on the PR has left open threads that need triage, fixing, replying, and resolving.

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable; otherwise findings churn round-over-round.
  • The user wants human reviewer feedback, not Copilot's.

Prerequisites

  • gh CLI installed and authenticated against the target repository.
  • PowerShell on PATH — Windows PowerShell 5.1+ (powershell.exe) or PowerShell 7+ (pwsh). Both are tested.
  • Copilot Code Review is the primary use case (01-request-review.ps1 uses GraphQL requestReviewsByLogin to trigger Copilot). It is NOT a hard requirement — if 01-request-review.ps1 fails because Copilot isn't enabled on the repo / account, the agent can still drive existing review threads (human, advanced-security, etc.) to completion by running steps 3–8 once as a single iteration; just skip the trigger + wait. There is no auto-detect for "Copilot unavailable" — the agent makes that decision after the trigger fails (the script can't reliably tell "Copilot disabled" from "Copilot enabled but not yet triggered" from API state alone).

Permissions: who can run the full loop

The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs Triage or Write permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (requestReviewsByLogin) is gated on that permission. Verified against the public REST + GraphQL surface in this PR's commit history — there is no public-API path for bot reviewers without write permission.

You are…What works
Repo collaborator with Triage / WriteFull loop: 01 triggers Copilot, 02 waits, 0408 triage / fix / reply, loop back to 01. Hands-off.
External PR author (no write permission)01 will throw a clear actionable error. Use -SingleIteration mode: address all current findings in one pass, then either click the UI 🔄 next to Copilot, or push a substantive commit (the synchronize event auto-triggers Copilot on most repos). Then re-run 02 to verify.

In single-iteration mode the loop's convergence boolean is Converged: true iff OpenThreadsAwaitingReply == 0 (the agent's side is done). The maintainer-side re-trigger then drives any additional rounds.

Every script dot-sources scripts/_lib.ps1 which runs Assert-GhReady on load: if gh is missing OR gh auth status fails, the script halts before any work with a single actionable error message naming the install command and gh auth login. The agent should surface that message to the user verbatim and stop the loop — do not retry or work around it.

Step-by-Step Workflow

The loop: steps 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9, then back to step 1 if Converged: false. Repeat the 1→9 round until step 9 returns Converged: true; only then run step 10 once and call task_complete. At every 10th round, the parent runs the round-cap recap gate before looping back — recap all prior rounds and stop if the loop has drifted out of the PR's original scope.

Each round runs steps 1–9; step 10 is a one-time cleanup after convergence. The parent agent coordinates; every sub-agent step runs in a fresh context with a bounded budget. Cross-cutting protocol (time-boxing, extension, single-iteration fallback): orchestration.md.

  1. Request review (parent) — see 01-request-review.md
  2. Wait for review (sub-agent, 20-min cap) — see 02-wait.md
  3. List + categorize open threads (sub-agent, 5 min) — see 03-list-threads.md
  4. Triage (sub-agent, 5 min per ≤5 threads) — see 04-triage.md
  5. Fix (sub-agents, parallel max 5, 5 min each) — see 05-fix.md
  6. Build + test per repo conventions (sub-agent, 10 min) — see 06-build-test.md
  7. Commit + push (parent) — see 07-commit-push.md
  8. Reply (always) + resolve (conditional) (sub-agent drafts, parent posts) — see 08-reply-resolve.md
  9. Convergence verify (sub-agent, 3 min) — see 09-convergence.md
    • Converged: false → loop back to step 1 for another round (re-trigger, wait, list, triage, fix, push, reply, re-check). Each round addresses Copilot's findings on the previous round's HEAD; the loop terminates as soon as Copilot has nothing new to say AND every open thread has a reply from the agent.
    • Converged: true → exit the loop, run step 10 once, call task_complete with the proof.
    • Every 10th round (10, 20, 30…) → run the round-cap recap gate before looping back. Recap ALL prior rounds against the PR's original scope and pick a verdict: CONTINUE, REVERT-AND-SHIP (drop drifted commits, ship the in-scope ones), or HAND-OFF (escalate to the user). This is the circuit breaker that stops a runaway bot-review loop.
  10. Cleanup outdated (parent, post-convergence, once) — see 10-cleanup.md

Convergence is computed by scripts/02-check-review-status.ps1 as a single Converged: true boolean. Do not call task_complete until it returns true; print the proof (HeadOid, LatestCopilotReview.commitOid, submittedAt) in the completion message.

Gotchas

The bundled scripts enforce the hard correctness invariants (trigger landing via copilot_work_started event id, Converged requiring HEAD-match + zero-awaiting + at-HEAD review, single-iteration fallback semantics, PR-state guard). Trust them — don't re-derive. The notes below cover decisions the scripts can't make for you:

  • Reply to every open thread; resolve only when the loop owns the disposition. For fix and decline threads, reply + resolve. For escalate-to-user threads, reply with the analysis but leave the thread OPEN (08-reply-and-resolve.ps1 -NoResolve) so the human merge owner can act on it. See 08-reply-resolve.md.
  • Copilot threads are loop-owned; human / advanced-security / other-bot threads default to escalate-to-user. Auto-resolving a human review thread can hide unaddressed concerns. See 04-triage.md for the rubric.
  • One focused commit per round, not one per PR. Bundling rounds destroys the audit trail of which finding drove which change and breaks git bisect. See 07-commit-push.md.
  • Build/test/lint with the repo's own commands (per its CONTRIBUTING / AGENTS / README / package.json / Makefile) before pushing a fix. Discovery procedure: 06-build-test.md.
  • Push back with written rationale when a Copilot finding would over-engineer the design for a hypothetical edge case. Auto-accepting every suggestion erodes the design — see the decline path in 04-triage.md.
  • Scripting traps (gh api graphql -F type-coercion, git stash push -m positional parsing, the three GraphQL traps for the reviewer mutation) are documented in references/api-quirks.md. Read before modifying any script.

Troubleshooting

IssueSolution
Script throws prerequisite missing — gh CLI is not on PATHInstall gh (winget install GitHub.cli on Windows; brew install gh on macOS; package manager on Linux; or download from https://cli.github.com). Then gh auth login. Surface the message to the user and STOP the loop — do not retry.
Script throws prerequisite missing — gh CLI is not authenticatedRun gh auth login. STOP the loop until the user completes auth.
Trigger fails or no copilot_work_started event landsPush a substantive (non-whitespace) commit — auto-assign on synchronize is the most reliable trigger. Persistent failure indicates Copilot Code Review may not be enabled on the repo / account (check repo Settings → Code & automation → Copilot, or account-level Copilot Pro/Pro+).
No new review after waiting ~10 minQuiet-period after recent dismissal or trivial-diff suppression. Push a substantive commit and retry. Do not blindly re-run 01-request-review.ps1 — it reports InFlight while Copilot is still a requested reviewer.
Outdated-but-unresolved threads in the open listExpected: unresolved state is the source of truth. Reply + resolve them like any other open thread. 10-cleanup-outdated.ps1 is only a final safety net.
Unsure whether to fix or decline a findingSee references/04-triage.md.
Need a reply phrasing for "fixed", "declined", or "drift"See the templates under templates/reply-fix.md, reply-decline.md, reply-drift.md, reply-partial.md.

References

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 8938,313

wshobson/agents

python-design-patterns

Python design patterns including KISS, Separation of Concerns, Single Responsibility, and composition over inheritance. Use this skill when designing a new service or component from scratch and choosing how to layer responsibilities, when refactoring a God class or monolithic function that has grown too large, when deciding whether to add a new abstraction or live with duplication, when evaluating a pull request for structural issues like tight coupling or leaking internal types, when choosing b

Computed 8812

JSONbored/metagraphed

metagraphed

Use when writing, validating, or preparing ANY contribution or pull request to the JSONbored/metagraphed repo — adding/enriching a subnet's public surfaces (the most common contribution), a code/schema change to the Worker API or build scripts, picking an issue, running the local gates, and formatting the commit + PR. metagraphed reviews PRs ONE-SHOT via the Gittensory Gate (the GitHub App that auto-merges/auto-closes) plus a strict CI suite; there is no review back-and-forth, so a PR must be co

Computed 86234,327

affaan-m/ECC

git-workflow

Git workflow patterns including branching strategies, commit conventions, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and collaborative development best practices for teams of all sizes.

Computed 8610,762

Jeffallan/claude-skills

code-reviewer

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quali