affaan-m/ECC/docs/zh-CN/skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline/SKILL.md
cost-aware-llm-pipeline
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
- Source repository stars
- 234,327
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-27
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
在保持质量的同时控制 LLM API 成本的模式。将模型路由、预算跟踪、重试逻辑和提示词缓存组合成一个可组合的流水线。
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline"Inspect the Agent Skill "cost-aware-llm-pipeline" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/docs/zh-CN/skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
何时激活
构建调用 LLM API(Claude、GPT 等)的应用程序时 处理具有不同复杂度的批量项目时 需要将 API 支出控制在预算范围内时 需要在复杂任务上优化成本而不牺牲质量时
构建调用 LLM API(Claude、GPT 等)的应用程序时处理具有不同复杂度的批量项目时需要将 API 支出控制在预算范围内时 - 02
核心概念
自动为简单任务选择更便宜的模型,为复杂任务保留昂贵的模型。
自动为简单任务选择更便宜的模型,为复杂任务保留昂贵的模型。使用冻结的数据类跟踪累计支出。每个 API 调用都会返回一个新的跟踪器 —— 永不改变状态。仅在暂时性错误时重试。对于认证或错误请求错误,快速失败。 - 03
1. 根据任务复杂度进行模型路由
自动为简单任务选择更便宜的模型,为复杂任务保留昂贵的模型。
自动为简单任务选择更便宜的模型,为复杂任务保留昂贵的模型。 - 04
2. 不可变的成本跟踪
使用冻结的数据类跟踪累计支出。每个 API 调用都会返回一个新的跟踪器 —— 永不改变状态。
使用冻结的数据类跟踪累计支出。每个 API 调用都会返回一个新的跟踪器 —— 永不改变状态。
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 65/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- affaan-m/ECC
- Skill path
- docs/zh-CN/skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
成本感知型 LLM 流水线
在保持质量的同时控制 LLM API 成本的模式。将模型路由、预算跟踪、重试逻辑和提示词缓存组合成一个可组合的流水线。
何时激活
- 构建调用 LLM API(Claude、GPT 等)的应用程序时
- 处理具有不同复杂度的批量项目时
- 需要将 API 支出控制在预算范围内时
- 需要在复杂任务上优化成本而不牺牲质量时
核心概念
1. 根据任务复杂度进行模型路由
自动为简单任务选择更便宜的模型,为复杂任务保留昂贵的模型。
MODEL_SONNET = "claude-sonnet-4-6"
MODEL_HAIKU = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
_SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD = 10_000 # chars
_SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD = 30 # items
def select_model(
text_length: int,
item_count: int,
force_model: str | None = None,
) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
if force_model is not None:
return force_model
if text_length >= _SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD or item_count >= _SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD:
return MODEL_SONNET # Complex task
return MODEL_HAIKU # Simple task (3-4x cheaper)
2. 不可变的成本跟踪
使用冻结的数据类跟踪累计支出。每个 API 调用都会返回一个新的跟踪器 —— 永不改变状态。
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostRecord:
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostTracker:
budget_limit: float = 1.00
records: tuple[CostRecord, ...] = ()
def add(self, record: CostRecord) -> "CostTracker":
"""Return new tracker with added record (never mutates self)."""
return CostTracker(
budget_limit=self.budget_limit,
records=(*self.records, record),
)
@property
def total_cost(self) -> float:
return sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
@property
def over_budget(self) -> bool:
return self.total_cost > self.budget_limit
3. 窄范围重试逻辑
仅在暂时性错误时重试。对于认证或错误请求错误,快速失败。
from anthropic import (
APIConnectionError,
InternalServerError,
RateLimitError,
)
_RETRYABLE_ERRORS = (APIConnectionError, RateLimitError, InternalServerError)
_MAX_RETRIES = 3
def call_with_retry(func, *, max_retries: int = _MAX_RETRIES):
"""Retry only on transient errors, fail fast on others."""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return func()
except _RETRYABLE_ERRORS:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff
# AuthenticationError, BadRequestError etc. → raise immediately
4. 提示词缓存
缓存长的系统提示词,以避免在每个请求上重新发送它们。
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": system_prompt,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}, # Cache this
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": user_input, # Variable part
},
],
}
]
组合
将所有四种技术组合到一个流水线函数中:
def process(text: str, config: Config, tracker: CostTracker) -> tuple[Result, CostTracker]:
# 1. Route model
model = select_model(len(text), estimated_items, config.force_model)
# 2. Check budget
if tracker.over_budget:
raise BudgetExceededError(tracker.total_cost, tracker.budget_limit)
# 3. Call with retry + caching
response = call_with_retry(lambda: client.messages.create(
model=model,
messages=build_cached_messages(system_prompt, text),
))
# 4. Track cost (immutable)
record = CostRecord(model=model, input_tokens=..., output_tokens=..., cost_usd=...)
tracker = tracker.add(record)
return parse_result(response), tracker
价格参考(2025-2026)
| 模型 | 输入(美元/百万令牌) | 输出(美元/百万令牌) | 相对成本 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.80 | $4.00 | 1x |
| Sonnet 4.6 | $3.00 | $15.00 | ~4x |
| Opus 4.5 | $15.00 | $75.00 | ~19x |
最佳实践
- 从最便宜的模型开始,仅在达到复杂度阈值时才路由到昂贵的模型
- 在处理批次之前设置明确的预算限制 —— 尽早失败而不是超支
- 记录模型选择决策,以便您可以根据实际数据调整阈值
- 对于超过 1024 个令牌的系统提示词,使用提示词缓存 —— 既能节省成本,又能降低延迟
- 切勿在认证或验证错误时重试 —— 仅针对暂时性故障(网络、速率限制、服务器错误)重试
应避免的反模式
- 无论复杂度如何,对所有请求都使用最昂贵的模型
- 对所有错误都进行重试(在永久性故障上浪费预算)
- 改变成本跟踪状态(使调试和审计变得困难)
- 在整个代码库中硬编码模型名称(使用常量或配置)
- 对重复的系统提示词忽略提示词缓存
适用场景
- 任何调用 Claude、OpenAI 或类似 LLM API 的应用程序
- 成本快速累积的批处理流水线
- 需要智能路由的多模型架构
- 需要预算护栏的生产系统
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
affaan-m/ECC
cost-aware-llm-pipeline
Cost optimization patterns for LLM API usage — model routing by task complexity, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching.
affaan-m/ECC
cost-aware-llm-pipeline
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
design-intelligence
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.