Best for
- Implementing data quality checks in pipelines
- Setting up Great Expectations validation
- Building comprehensive dbt test suites
wshobson/agents/plugins/data-engineering/skills/data-quality-frameworks/SKILL.md
Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
Decision brief
Production patterns for implementing data quality with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts to ensure reliable data pipelines.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill "plugins/data-engineering/skills/data-quality-frameworks"Inspect the Agent Skill "data-quality-frameworks" from https://github.com/wshobson/agents/blob/c4b82b0ad771190355eb8e204b1329732a18449a/plugins/data-engineering/skills/data-quality-frameworks/SKILL.md at commit c4b82b0ad771190355eb8e204b1329732a18449a. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Quick Start” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Great Expectations Setup” section in the pinned source before continuing.
context = gx.getcontext() pipeline = DataQualityPipeline(context)
Implementing data quality checks in pipelines
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 77/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 38,313 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Production patterns for implementing data quality with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts to ensure reliable data pipelines.
| Dimension | Description | Example Check |
|---|---|---|
| Completeness | No missing values | expect_column_values_to_not_be_null |
| Uniqueness | No duplicates | expect_column_values_to_be_unique |
| Validity | Values in expected range | expect_column_values_to_be_in_set |
| Accuracy | Data matches reality | Cross-reference validation |
| Consistency | No contradictions | expect_column_pair_values_A_to_be_greater_than_B |
| Timeliness | Data is recent | expect_column_max_to_be_between |
/\
/ \ Integration Tests (cross-table)
/────\
/ \ Unit Tests (single column)
/────────\
/ \ Schema Tests (structure)
/────────────\
# Install
pip install great_expectations
# Initialize project
great_expectations init
# Create datasource
great_expectations datasource new
# great_expectations/checkpoints/daily_validation.yml
import great_expectations as gx
# Create context
context = gx.get_context()
# Create expectation suite
suite = context.add_expectation_suite("orders_suite")
# Add expectations
suite.add_expectation(
gx.expectations.ExpectColumnValuesToNotBeNull(column="order_id")
)
suite.add_expectation(
gx.expectations.ExpectColumnValuesToBeUnique(column="order_id")
)
# Validate
results = context.run_checkpoint(checkpoint_name="daily_orders")
Detailed pattern documentation lives in references/details.md. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
report.append("")
for table, result in results.items():
status = "✅" if result.passed else "❌"
report.append(f"### {status} {table}")
report.append(f"- Expectations: {result.total_expectations}")
report.append(f"- Failed: {result.failed_expectations}")
if not result.passed:
report.append("- Failed checks:")
for detail in result.details:
if not detail["success"]:
report.append(f" - {detail['expectation']}: {detail['observed_value']}")
report.append("")
return "\n".join(report)
context = gx.get_context() pipeline = DataQualityPipeline(context)
tables_to_validate = { "orders": "orders_suite", "customers": "customers_suite", "products": "products_suite", }
results = pipeline.run_all(tables_to_validate) report = pipeline.generate_report(results)
if not all(r.passed for r in results.values()): print(report) raise ValueError("Data quality checks failed!")
## Best Practices
### Do's
- **Test early** - Validate source data before transformations
- **Test incrementally** - Add tests as you find issues
- **Document expectations** - Clear descriptions for each test
- **Alert on failures** - Integrate with monitoring
- **Version contracts** - Track schema changes
### Don'ts
- **Don't test everything** - Focus on critical columns
- **Don't ignore warnings** - They often precede failures
- **Don't skip freshness** - Stale data is bad data
- **Don't hardcode thresholds** - Use dynamic baselines
- **Don't test in isolation** - Test relationships too
Alternatives
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
Use BEFORE writing/changing tests, adding mocks, or test-only methods on production classes — vs mocking-the-mock, production pollution, partial mocks, and overfit/tautological assertions
event4u-app/agent-config
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
event4u-app/agent-config
Use when writing, generating, or improving Pest tests for Laravel — clear intent, good coverage, maintainable structure, and alignment with project testing conventions.