Best for
- Defining new features from scratch
- Gathering comprehensive requirements
- Writing specifications in EARS format
Jeffallan/claude-skills/skills/feature-forge/SKILL.md
Conducts structured requirements workshops to produce feature specifications, user stories, EARS-format functional requirements, acceptance criteria, and implementation checklists. Use when defining new features, gathering requirements, or writing specifications. Invoke for feature definition, requirements gathering, user stories, EARS format specs, PRDs, acceptance criteria, or requirement matrices.
Decision brief
Requirements specialist conducting structured workshops to define comprehensive feature specifications.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill "skills/feature-forge"Inspect the Agent Skill "feature-forge" from https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills/blob/e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319/skills/feature-forge/SKILL.md at commit e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
1. Discover - Use AskUserQuestions to understand the feature goal, target users, and user value. Present structured choices where possible (e.g., user types, priority level). 2. Interview - Systematic questioning from both PM and Dev perspectives using AskUserQuestions for struc…
Operate with two perspectives: - PM Hat: Focused on user value, business goals, success metrics - Dev Hat: Focused on technical feasibility, security, performance, edge cases
Defining new features from scratch
Load detailed guidance based on context:
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 82/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 10,762 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Requirements specialist conducting structured workshops to define comprehensive feature specifications.
Operate with two perspectives:
AskUserQuestions to understand the feature goal, target users, and user value. Present structured choices where possible (e.g., user types, priority level).AskUserQuestions for structured choices and open-ended follow-ups. Use multi-agent discovery with Task subagents when the feature spans multiple domains (see interview-questions.md for guidance).AskUserQuestions to review acceptance criteria with stakeholder, presenting key trade-offs as structured choicesLoad detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| EARS Syntax | references/ears-syntax.md | Writing functional requirements |
| Interview Questions | references/interview-questions.md | Gathering requirements |
| Specification Template | references/specification-template.md | Writing final spec document |
| Acceptance Criteria | references/acceptance-criteria.md | Given/When/Then format |
| Pre-Discovery Subagents | references/pre-discovery-subagents.md | Multi-domain features needing front-loaded context |
AskUserQuestions tool for structured elicitation (priority, scope, format choices)AskUserQuestions can provide structured optionsThe final specification must include:
Inline EARS format examples (load references/ears-syntax.md for full syntax):
When <trigger>, the <system> shall <response>.
Where <feature> is active, the <system> shall <behaviour>.
The <system> shall <action> within <measure>.
Inline acceptance criteria example (load references/acceptance-criteria.md for full format):
Given a registered user is on the login page,
When they submit valid credentials,
Then they are redirected to the dashboard within 2 seconds.
Save as: specs/{feature_name}.spec.md
Alternatives
event4u-app/agent-config
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Medicinal chemistry filters for compound triage. Apply drug-likeness rules (Lipinski, Veber, CNS), structural alert catalogs (PAINS, NIBR, ChEMBL), complexity metrics, and the medchem query language for library filtering.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Use NeuroKit2 to build or audit reproducible research workflows for physiological time-series preprocessing, event/interval analysis, multimodal alignment, variability, and complexity. Trigger when code imports neurokit2 or needs its current APIs, schemas, and method-aware validation—not for diagnosis or device validation.