Source profileQuality 91/100

github/awesome-copilot/skills/foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit/SKILL.md

foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit

Ongoing development guidance for agentic web apps that pair a CopilotKit frontend with Microsoft Agent Framework agents on Azure AI Foundry hosted agents over the AG-UI protocol - add and gate agent tools, wire human-in-the-loop approvals, build generative UI and shared state, debug the event stream, upgrade pre-1.0 packages safely, and deploy hosted agent updates.

Source repository stars
37,126
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Use this skill for development work inside an EXISTING application built on this stack: a React/Next.js frontend using CopilotKit, connected over the AG-UI protocol to a Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) agent (Python or .NET) that runs as — or is being developed against — an Azur…

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Workflow

      Follow these steps for every task on this stack:

      Identify the wiring first. Inspect the codebase before changing anything:addagentframeworkfastapiendpoint(...) (Python) or MapAGUI(...) (.NET) wrapping an in-process agent → Architecture A (in-process AG-UI endpoint).A hosted agent whose own container serves AG-UI, declared with protocol: invocations in agent.yaml → Architecture B.
    2. 02

      Mental model

      The single most important fact: a deployed Foundry hosted agent endpoint does not speak AG-UI by default. It exposes an OpenAI Responses endpoint (.../protocols/openai/responses) and/or a raw .../protocols/invocations endpoint. AG-UI must be produced somewhere, and where it is p…

      The single most important fact: a deployed Foundry hosted agent endpoint does not speak AG-UI by default. It exposes an OpenAI Responses endpoint (.../protocols/openai/responses) and/or a raw .../protocols/invocations e…
    3. 03

      Task playbooks

      1. Define the tool on the agent (@tool in Python; AIFunctionFactory.Create in .NET) with typed, described parameters. 2. Keep docstrings grounding-safe: do not put concrete example values in parameter descriptions for fields the model must derive from real data — models copy lit…

      Define the tool on the agent (@tool in Python; AIFunctionFactory.Create in .NET) with typed, described parameters.Keep docstrings grounding-safe: do not put concrete example values in parameter descriptions for fields the model must derive from real data — models copy literal examples. Use placeholders and validate inside the tool.Return compact, model-consumable values; rich formatting belongs in the UI render, not the tool result.
    4. 04

      Add or modify an agent tool

      1. Define the tool on the agent (@tool in Python; AIFunctionFactory.Create in .NET) with typed, described parameters. 2. Keep docstrings grounding-safe: do not put concrete example values in parameter descriptions for fields the model must derive from real data — models copy lit…

      Define the tool on the agent (@tool in Python; AIFunctionFactory.Create in .NET) with typed, described parameters.Keep docstrings grounding-safe: do not put concrete example values in parameter descriptions for fields the model must derive from real data — models copy literal examples. Use placeholders and validate inside the tool.Return compact, model-consumable values; rich formatting belongs in the UI render, not the tool result.
    5. 05

      Wire human-in-the-loop onto an existing tool

      Follow references/hitl.md end to end. Summary: mark the tool (approvalmode="alwaysrequire" / ApprovalRequiredAIFunction), enable confirmation on the AG-UI wrapper, register the approval UI hook on the frontend, and make the response payload shape match what the server detection…

      Follow references/hitl.md end to end. Summary: mark the tool (approvalmode="alwaysrequire" / ApprovalRequiredAIFunction), enable confirmation on the AG-UI wrapper, register the approval UI hook on the frontend, and make…

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    Reads files

    low · line 28

    The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

    **Identify the wiring first.** Inspect the codebase before changing anything:

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score91/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars37,126SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    github/awesome-copilot
    Skill path
    skills/foundry-hosted-agent-copilotkit/SKILL.md
    Commit
    9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Developing with CopilotKit + AG-UI + Azure AI Foundry Hosted Agents

    Use this skill for development work inside an EXISTING application built on this stack: a React/Next.js frontend using CopilotKit, connected over the AG-UI protocol to a Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF) agent (Python or .NET) that runs as — or is being developed against — an Azure AI Foundry hosted agent (paid Azure service; usage may incur costs).

    Do NOT use this skill to scaffold a new project. Dedicated scaffolders exist (the CopilotKit CLI, azd ai agent init); use those, then return here for everything that follows: adding tools, gating them behind approvals, generative UI, shared state, debugging, dependency upgrades, and deploying agent updates.

    Mental model

    CopilotKit hooks (React)            useFrontendTool / useHumanInTheLoop /
            │                           useRenderToolCall / useCoAgent
            ▼
    CopilotKit Runtime (route handler)  agents: { <name>: new HttpAgent({ url }) }
            │  AG-UI events over SSE
            ▼
    AG-UI endpoint                      ← WHERE this lives defines your architecture
            │
            ▼
    MAF Agent (tools, approval modes)   → model deployment
    

    The single most important fact: a deployed Foundry hosted agent endpoint does not speak AG-UI by default. It exposes an OpenAI Responses endpoint (.../protocols/openai/responses) and/or a raw .../protocols/invocations endpoint. AG-UI must be produced somewhere, and where it is produced determines how every feature (especially human-in-the-loop) behaves. The three wirings are described in references/architecture.md.

    Workflow

    Follow these steps for every task on this stack:

    1. Identify the wiring first. Inspect the codebase before changing anything:
      • add_agent_framework_fastapi_endpoint(...) (Python) or MapAGUI(...) (.NET) wrapping an in-process agent → Architecture A (in-process AG-UI endpoint).
      • A hosted agent whose own container serves AG-UI, declared with protocol: invocations in agent.yaml → Architecture B.
      • A separate service translating between the AG-UI endpoint and a hosted agent's /responses endpoint (look for previous_response_id, mcp_approval_response, or a Foundry conversation object in the code) → Architecture C (translation bridge).
      • Confirm the frontend agent name: the key in the runtime agents config, the agent prop on the <CopilotKit> provider, and the hosted agent name in agent.yaml must all agree.
    2. Ground in live documentation. Every layer here is pre-1.0 or preview and moves between minor versions. Never trust memorized APIs:
      • MAF and Foundry hosted agents: use the Microsoft Docs MCP tools when available, otherwise learn.microsoft.com (/agent-framework/integrations/ag-ui/, /azure/foundry/).
      • CopilotKit: docs.copilotkit.ai (Microsoft Agent Framework section). Verify hook and runtime API names against the TypeScript declarations bundled in the installed @copilotkit/* packages — names have churned (useCopilotAction is legacy; current names include useFrontendTool, useHumanInTheLoop, useRenderToolCall, useCoAgent).
      • AG-UI protocol: docs.ag-ui.com (event reference, dojo patterns).
    3. Execute the task using the matching reference below.
    4. Verify adversarially. A compiling build, a started dev server, or one successful chat reply is NOT proof. Apply the completion criteria at the end of this skill.

    References

    Load on demand; each is self-contained:

    ReferenceLoad when
    references/architecture.mdChoosing or understanding the wiring; local-vs-deployed modes; why a translation bridge exists and what it must handle
    references/patterns.mdImplementing any of the 7 AG-UI interaction patterns (frontend tools, backend tool rendering, HITL, generative UI, shared state, predictive state)
    references/hitl.mdAdding or debugging human-in-the-loop approvals, including the known duplicate-execution hazard
    references/troubleshooting.mdAny failure: symptom → root cause → fix tables for every layer
    references/upgrading.mdBumping any dependency; version compatibility rules; tracked upstream issues
    references/deploy-loop.mdRunning the agent locally with azd ai agent run, deploying updates, deployment gotchas

    Task playbooks

    Add or modify an agent tool

    1. Define the tool on the agent (@tool in Python; AIFunctionFactory.Create in .NET) with typed, described parameters.
    2. Keep docstrings grounding-safe: do not put concrete example values in parameter descriptions for fields the model must derive from real data — models copy literal examples. Use placeholders and validate inside the tool.
    3. Return compact, model-consumable values; rich formatting belongs in the UI render, not the tool result.
    4. Decide the approval mode now: side-effecting tools get approval_mode="always_require" (see references/hitl.md); read-only tools stay unrestricted.
    5. If the tool call should render in the UI, add a useRenderToolCall/render entry for it (references/patterns.md).
    6. Verify live: trigger the tool through the chat UI, confirm the call and result stream as TOOL_CALL_* events, and confirm renamed or re-typed parameters did not break any frontend component that parses the arguments.

    Wire human-in-the-loop onto an existing tool

    Follow references/hitl.md end to end. Summary: mark the tool (approval_mode="always_require" / ApprovalRequiredAIFunction), enable confirmation on the AG-UI wrapper, register the approval UI hook on the frontend, and make the response payload shape match what the server detection expects. Then test approve AND reject AND a follow-up turn after approval (see the duplicate-execution hazard).

    Build generative UI or shared state

    Follow the pattern table in references/patterns.md. Know the honesty caveat: state synchronization patterns are native when the AG-UI adapter wraps an in-process agent (Architecture A/B); through a Responses-protocol bridge (Architecture C) they require explicit synthesis work — check what the codebase actually implements before promising the feature.

    Debug a broken flow

    1. Reproduce at the lowest layer first: curl -N the AG-UI endpoint with a minimal RunAgentInput JSON body and read the raw SSE events. If the bug reproduces there, the frontend is innocent.
    2. For hosted agents, go one layer lower: call the agent's /responses endpoint directly. This is how the known re-execution bug was isolated to the framework rather than the UI stack.
    3. Match the symptom against references/troubleshooting.md — exact error strings are listed.
    4. Restart a locally running hosted agent (azd ai agent run) between verification passes if the agent holds in-memory state; stale state makes tests pass or fail for the wrong reason.

    Upgrade dependencies

    Follow references/upgrading.md. Never bump a single package in isolation: the version relationship rules there (runtime ↔ AG-UI client, agent-framework line consistency, hosting protocol ↔ manifest version) must hold simultaneously, and any local workaround must be re-validated against its tracked upstream issue before removal.

    Deploy an agent update

    Follow references/deploy-loop.md: iterate locally against the real agent with azd ai agent run, then azd deploy (each deploy creates a new agent version), then verify the deployed agent — including the approval pause — before declaring success.

    Completion criteria

    A change on this stack is done only when ALL of these hold:

    1. The read/query path works through the real UI (not only via curl).
    2. Every approval-gated tool was tested both ways: approve → the tool executes server-side and state visibly changes; reject → the tool does not run and the agent acknowledges.
    3. At least one follow-up turn was sent in the same thread after an approval, and the gated tool did NOT silently execute again (references/hitl.md, duplicate-execution hazard).
    4. Tool calls render correctly at stream end, not just during streaming (message snapshots can differ from live events).
    5. For deployed changes: the checks above were run against the deployed endpoint, not only locally — deployment success is not proof of behavior.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing