affaan-m/ECC/docs/ja-JP/skills/gateguard/SKILL.md
gateguard
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
- Source repository stars
- 234,327
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 1
- Last source update
- 2026-07-27
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
A PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation ("are you sure?"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.
Not for
- Don't use self-evaluation instead. "Are you sure?" always gets "yes." This is experimentally verified.
- Don't skip the data schema check. Both A/B test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used %Y/%m/%d %H:%M. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/gateguard"Inspect the Agent Skill "gateguard" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/docs/ja-JP/skills/gateguard/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Quick Start
The hook at scripts/hooks/gateguard-fact-force.js is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.
The hook at scripts/hooks/gateguard-fact-force.js is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with ECCGATEGUARD=off. For hook-level control, keep using ECCDISABLEDHOOKS with the GateGuard hook ID.This adds .gateguard.yml for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles). - 02
When to Activate
Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules
Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modulesProjects with data files that have specific schemas or date formatsTeams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns - 03
Core Concept
LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.
LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.But asking "list every file that imports this module" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.No competitor does all three. Most stop at deny. - 04
Evidence
Two independent A/B tests, identical agents, same task:
Two independent A/B tests, identical agents, same task:Both agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth. - 05
Gate Types
MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.
MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.Triggers on: rm -rf, git reset --hard, git push --force, drop table, etc.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
### Edit / MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
### Write Gate (first new file creation)Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 80/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- affaan-m/ECC
- Skill path
- docs/ja-JP/skills/gateguard/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate
A PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation ("are you sure?"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.
When to Activate
- Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules
- Projects with data files that have specific schemas or date formats
- Teams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns
- Any workflow where Claude tends to guess instead of investigating
Core Concept
LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.
But asking "list every file that imports this module" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.
Three-stage gate:
1. DENY — block the first Edit/Write/Bash attempt
2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather
3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presented
No competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.
Evidence
Two independent A/B tests, identical agents, same task:
| Task | Gated | Ungated | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analytics module | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 | +1.5 |
| Webhook validator | 10.0/10 | 7.0/10 | +3.0 |
| Average | 9.0 | 6.75 | +2.25 |
Both agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.
Gate Types
Edit / MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)
MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.
Before editing {file_path}, present these facts:
1. List ALL files that import/require this file (search the tree — Glob/Grep, or find/grep via Bash)
2. List the public functions/classes affected by this change
3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,
and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim
Write Gate (first new file creation)
Before creating {file_path}, present these facts:
1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file
2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (search the tree — Glob/Grep, or find/grep via Bash)
3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,
and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim
Destructive Bash Gate (every destructive command)
Triggers on: rm -rf, git reset --hard, git push --force, drop table, etc.
1. List all files/data this command will modify or delete
2. Write a one-line rollback procedure
3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim
Routine Bash Gate (once per session)
1. The current user request in one sentence
2. What this specific command verifies or produces
Quick Start
Option A: Use the ECC hook (zero install)
The hook at scripts/hooks/gateguard-fact-force.js is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.
If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with
ECC_GATEGUARD=off. For hook-level control, keep using
ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS with the GateGuard hook ID.
Option B: Full package with config
pip install gateguard-ai
gateguard init
This adds .gateguard.yml for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles).
Anti-Patterns
- Don't use self-evaluation instead. "Are you sure?" always gets "yes." This is experimentally verified.
- Don't skip the data schema check. Both A/B test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used
%Y/%m/%d %H:%M. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs. - Don't gate every single Bash command. Routine bash gates once per session. Destructive bash gates every time. This balance avoids slowdown while catching real risks.
Best Practices
- Let the gate fire naturally. Don't try to pre-answer the gate questions — the investigation itself is what improves quality.
- Customize gate messages for your domain. If your project has specific conventions, add them to the gate prompts.
- Use
.gateguard.ymlto ignore paths like.venv/,node_modules/,.git/.
Related Skills
safety-guard— Runtime safety checks (complementary, not overlapping)code-reviewer— Post-edit review (GateGuard is pre-edit investigation)
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
affaan-m/ECC
gateguard
Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.
affaan-m/ECC
gateguard
Review gateguard's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
design-intelligence
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.