Best for
- Building patient encounter workflows (complaint, exam, diagnosis, prescription)
- Implementing clinical note-taking (structured + free text + voice-to-text)
- Designing prescription/medication modules with drug interaction checking
affaan-m/ECC/skills/healthcare-emr-patterns/SKILL.md
EMR/EHR development patterns for healthcare applications. Clinical safety, encounter workflows, prescription generation, clinical decision support integration, and accessibility-first UI for medical data entry.
Decision brief
Patterns for building Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. Prioritizes patient safety, clinical accuracy, and practitioner efficiency.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/healthcare-emr-patterns"Inspect the Agent Skill "healthcare-emr-patterns" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/skills/healthcare-emr-patterns/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Example 2: Medication Safety Workflow” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Building patient encounter workflows (complaint, exam, diagnosis, prescription)
Every design decision must be evaluated against: "Could this harm a patient?"
Every design decision must be evaluated against: "Could this harm a patient?"
Clinical encounters should flow vertically on a single page — no tab switching:
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 86/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Patterns for building Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. Prioritizes patient safety, clinical accuracy, and practitioner efficiency.
Every design decision must be evaluated against: "Could this harm a patient?"
Clinical encounters should flow vertically on a single page — no tab switching:
Patient Header (sticky — always visible)
├── Demographics, allergies, active medications
│
Encounter Flow (vertical scroll)
├── 1. Chief Complaint (structured templates + free text)
├── 2. History of Present Illness
├── 3. Physical Examination (system-wise)
├── 4. Vitals (auto-trigger clinical scoring)
├── 5. Diagnosis (ICD-10/SNOMED search)
├── 6. Medications (drug DB + interaction check)
├── 7. Investigations (lab/radiology orders)
├── 8. Plan & Follow-up
└── 9. Sign / Lock / Print
interface ClinicalTemplate {
id: string;
name: string; // e.g., "Chest Pain"
chips: string[]; // clickable symptom chips
requiredFields: string[]; // mandatory data points
redFlags: string[]; // triggers non-dismissable alert
icdSuggestions: string[]; // pre-mapped diagnosis codes
}
Red flags in any template must trigger a visible, non-dismissable alert — NOT a toast notification.
User selects drug
→ Check current medications for interactions
→ Check encounter medications for interactions
→ Check patient allergies
→ Validate dose against weight/age/renal function
→ If CRITICAL interaction: BLOCK prescribing entirely
→ Clinician must document override reason to proceed past a block
→ If MAJOR interaction: display warning, require acknowledgment
→ Log all alerts and override reasons in audit trail
Critical interactions block prescribing by default. The clinician must explicitly override with a documented reason stored in the audit trail. The system never silently allows a critical interaction.
Once a clinical encounter is signed:
Vitals Display: Current values with normal range highlighting (green/yellow/red), trend arrows vs previous, clinical scoring auto-calculated (NEWS2, qSOFA), escalation guidance inline.
Lab Results Display: Normal range highlighting, previous value comparison, critical values with non-dismissable alert, collection/analysis timestamps, pending orders with expected turnaround.
Prescription PDF: One-click generation with patient demographics, allergies, diagnosis, drug details (generic + brand, dose, route, frequency, duration), clinician signature block.
Healthcare UIs have stricter requirements than typical web apps:
any type for clinical data structuresDoctor opens encounter for Patient #4521
→ Sticky header shows: "Rajesh M, 58M, Allergies: Penicillin, Active Meds: Metformin 500mg"
→ Chief Complaint: selects "Chest Pain" template
→ Clicks chips: "substernal", "radiating to left arm", "crushing"
→ Red flag "crushing substernal chest pain" triggers non-dismissable alert
→ Examination: CVS system — "S1 S2 normal, no murmur"
→ Vitals: HR 110, BP 90/60, SpO2 94%
→ NEWS2 auto-calculates: score 8, risk HIGH, escalation alert shown
→ Diagnosis: searches "ACS" → selects ICD-10 I21.9
→ Medications: selects Aspirin 300mg
→ CDSS checks against Metformin: no interaction
→ Signs encounter → locked, addendum-only from this point
Doctor prescribes Warfarin for Patient #4521
→ CDSS detects: Warfarin + Aspirin = CRITICAL interaction
→ UI: red non-dismissable modal blocks prescribing
→ Doctor clicks "Override with reason"
→ Types: "Benefits outweigh risks — monitored INR protocol"
→ Override reason + alert stored in audit trail
→ Prescription proceeds with documented override
Encounter #E-2024-0891 signed by Dr. Shah at 14:30
→ All fields locked — no edit buttons visible
→ "Add Addendum" button available
→ Dr. Shah clicks addendum, adds: "Lab results received — Troponin elevated"
→ New record E-2024-0891-A1 linked to original
→ Timeline shows both: original encounter + addendum with timestamps
Alternatives
affaan-m/ECC
Review healthcare-emr-patterns's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
event4u-app/agent-config
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli
Use when the user wants to generate an image or video via Higgsfield AI. Covers 30+ models: Soul V2, Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, Veo 3.1, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana 2. Also covers Marketing Studio — branded ad video/image with avatars and products. Use whenever: "generate an image", "make a video", "animate this photo", "image-to-video", "img2vid", "edit this image with AI", "produce a clip", "create an ad", "make a UGC video", "marketing video", "brand video", "TV spot", "import product from URL", "
github/awesome-copilot
Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and continuous monitoring. Use when the user mentions create evaluator, LLM judge, hallucination, faithfulness, correctness, relevance, run eval, score spans, score experiment, trigger-run, column mapping, continuous monitoring, or improve evaluator prompt.