Best for
- Preparing to split a flat network into trusted, IoT, guest, server, or
- Moving DHCP clients to Pi-hole, AdGuard Home, Unbound, or another local DNS
- Adding WireGuard, Tailscale, ZeroTier, OpenVPN, or router-native VPN access.
affaan-m/ECC/skills/homelab-network-readiness/SKILL.md
Readiness checklist for homelab VLAN segmentation, local DNS filtering, and WireGuard-style remote access before changing router, firewall, DHCP, or VPN configuration.
Decision brief
Use this skill before changing a home or small-lab network that mixes VLANs, Pi-hole or another local DNS resolver, firewall rules, and remote VPN access.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/homelab-network-readiness"Inspect the Agent Skill "homelab-network-readiness" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/skills/homelab-network-readiness/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Each network has a reason to exist and a clear trust boundary.
Preparing to split a flat network into trusted, IoT, guest, server, or
Keep the first answer read-only: inventory, risks, staged plan, validation,
Collect this before giving implementation steps:
Start with intent rather than vendor syntax.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 84/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Use this skill before changing a home or small-lab network that mixes VLANs, Pi-hole or another local DNS resolver, firewall rules, and remote VPN access.
This is a planning and review skill. Do not turn it into copy-paste router, firewall, or VPN configuration unless the target platform, current topology, rollback path, console access, and maintenance window are all known.
Collect this before giving implementation steps:
| Area | Questions |
|---|---|
| Internet edge | What is the modem or ONT? Is the ISP router bridged or still routing? |
| Gateway | What routes, firewalls, handles DHCP, and terminates VPNs? |
| Switching | Which switch ports are uplinks, access ports, trunks, or unmanaged? |
| Wi-Fi | Which SSIDs map to which networks, and are APs wired or mesh? |
| Addressing | What subnets exist today, and which ranges conflict with VPN sites? |
| DNS/DHCP | Which service currently hands out leases and resolver addresses? |
| Management | How will the operator reach the gateway, switch, and AP after changes? |
| Recovery | What can be reverted locally if DNS, DHCP, VLANs, or VPN routes break? |
Start with intent rather than vendor syntax.
| Zone | Typical contents | Default policy |
|---|---|---|
| Trusted | Laptops, phones, admin workstations | Can reach shared services and management only when needed |
| Servers | NAS, Home Assistant, lab hosts, DNS resolver | Accepts narrow inbound flows from trusted clients |
| IoT | TVs, smart plugs, cameras, speakers | Internet access plus explicit exceptions only |
| Guest | Visitor devices | Internet-only, no LAN reachability |
| Management | Gateway, switches, APs, controllers | Reachable only from trusted admin devices |
| VPN | Remote clients | Same or narrower access than trusted clients |
Before recommending VLAN IDs or subnets, confirm:
Pi-hole or another local resolver should be introduced as a dependency, not as a single point of failure.
home.arpa names.Useful validation evidence:
Client gets expected DHCP lease
Client receives expected DNS resolver
Public DNS lookup succeeds
Local home.arpa lookup succeeds
Blocked test domain is blocked only where intended
Gateway and DNS admin interfaces are not reachable from guest or IoT networks
For WireGuard-style access, decide what the VPN is allowed to reach before generating keys or opening ports.
| Mode | Use when | Risk notes |
|---|---|---|
| Split tunnel to one subnet | Remote admin for NAS or lab hosts | Keep route list narrow |
| Split tunnel to trusted services | Access selected apps by IP or DNS | Requires precise firewall rules |
| Full tunnel | Untrusted networks or travel | More bandwidth and DNS responsibility |
| Overlay VPN | Simpler remote access with identity controls | Still needs ACL review |
Do not recommend port forwarding until the operator confirms:
Prefer small, reversible changes:
homelab-network-setupnetwork-config-validationnetwork-interface-health