Best for
- Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operatio…
Jeffallan/claude-skills/skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md
Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases. Use when modernizing legacy systems, implementing strangler fig pattern or branch by abstraction, decomposing monoliths, upgrading frameworks or languages, or reducing technical debt without disrupting business operations.
Decision brief
Designs incremental migration strategies, identifies service boundaries, produces dependency maps and migration roadmaps, and generates API facade designs for aging codebases.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills --skill "skills/legacy-modernizer"Inspect the Agent Skill "legacy-modernizer" from https://github.com/Jeffallan/claude-skills/blob/e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319/skills/legacy-modernizer/SKILL.md at commit e8be415bc94d8d6ebddc2fb50e5d03c6e27d4319. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
1. Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding. - Validation checkpoint: Confirm all external integrations and data contracts are documented before moving to step 2.
if flagenabled("USENEWPAYMENTGATEWAY"): result = newgateway.charge(order) else: result = legacygateway.charge(order) python
Load detailed guidance based on context:
Review the “Code Examples” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Strangler Fig Facade (Python)” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
return self._new.fetch(order_id)Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 10,762 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Assess system — Analyze codebase, dependencies, risks, and business constraints. Produce a dependency map and risk register before proceeding.
Plan migration — Design an incremental roadmap with explicit rollback strategies per phase. Reference references/system-assessment.md for code analysis templates.
Build safety net — Create characterization tests and monitoring before touching production code. Target 80%+ coverage of existing behavior.
Migrate incrementally — Apply strangler fig pattern with feature flags. Route traffic via a facade; shift load gradually.
Validate & iterate — Run full test suite, review monitoring dashboards, and confirm business behavior is preserved before retiring legacy code.
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Strangler Fig | references/strangler-fig-pattern.md | Incremental replacement, facade layer, routing |
| Refactoring | references/refactoring-patterns.md | Extract service, branch by abstraction, adapters |
| Migration | references/migration-strategies.md | Database, UI, API, framework migrations |
| Testing | references/legacy-testing.md | Characterization tests, golden master, approval |
| Assessment | references/system-assessment.md | Code analysis, dependency mapping, risk evaluation |
# facade.py — routes requests to legacy or new service based on a feature flag
import os
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
from new_service import NewOrderService
class OrderServiceFacade:
def __init__(self):
self._legacy = LegacyOrderService()
self._new = NewOrderService()
def get_order(self, order_id: str):
if os.getenv("USE_NEW_ORDER_SERVICE", "false").lower() == "true":
return self._new.fetch(order_id)
return self._legacy.get(order_id)
# feature_flags.py — thin wrapper around an environment or config-based flag store
import os
def flag_enabled(flag_name: str, default: bool = False) -> bool:
"""Check whether a migration feature flag is active."""
return os.getenv(flag_name, str(default)).lower() == "true"
# Usage
if flag_enabled("USE_NEW_PAYMENT_GATEWAY"):
result = new_gateway.charge(order)
else:
result = legacy_gateway.charge(order)
# test_characterization_orders.py
# Captures existing legacy behavior as a golden-master safety net.
import pytest
from legacy_service import LegacyOrderService
service = LegacyOrderService()
@pytest.mark.parametrize("order_id,expected_status", [
("ORD-001", "SHIPPED"),
("ORD-002", "PENDING"),
("ORD-003", "CANCELLED"),
])
def test_order_status_golden_master(order_id, expected_status):
"""Fail loudly if legacy behavior changes unexpectedly."""
result = service.get(order_id)
assert result["status"] == expected_status, (
f"Characterization broken for {order_id}: "
f"expected {expected_status}, got {result['status']}"
)
When implementing modernization, provide:
Strangler fig pattern, branch by abstraction, characterization testing, incremental migration, feature flags, canary deployments, API versioning, database refactoring, microservices extraction, technical debt reduction, zero-downtime deployment
Alternatives
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Build, inspect, test, and analyze bounded process-based discrete-event simulations with SimPy, including events, resources, interrupts, monitoring, replications, warm-up, and reproducible output analysis.
github/awesome-copilot
Build, scaffold, and deploy Power Automate cloud flows using the FlowStudio MCP server. Your agent constructs flow definitions, wires connections, deploys, and tests — all via MCP without opening the portal. Load this skill when asked to: create a flow, build a new flow, deploy a flow definition, scaffold a Power Automate workflow, construct a flow JSON, update an existing flow's actions, patch a flow definition, add actions to a flow, wire up connections, or generate a workflow definition from
affaan-m/ECC
E2E testing for Windows native desktop apps (WPF, WinForms, Win32/MFC, Qt) using pywinauto and Windows UI Automation.
github/awesome-copilot
Improve AI application with evaluation-driven development. Define eval criteria, instrument the application, build golden datasets, observe and evaluate application runs, analyze results, and produce a concrete action plan for improvements. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.