Source profileQuality 67/100

sonichi/sutando/skills/observe/SKILL.md

observe

/observe — natural-language entry to the Policy Interaction Layer: compile an NL request into a structured observation/subscription policy, confirm via effect-card (or standing approval), then subscribe on the events plane.

Source repository stars
359
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

The owner (or a scoped user) says what they want watched, in natural language:

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/sonichi/sutando --skill "skills/observe"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "observe" from https://github.com/sonichi/sutando/blob/6a8f0fccd32e5aa620a3572c8885544f144bb6fe/skills/observe/SKILL.md at commit 6a8f0fccd32e5aa620a3572c8885544f144bb6fe. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Processing convention (core agent, on an /observe owner task)

      1. Compile (LLM-side — you): produce a draft dict: {roomid, eventtypes[], mode, costcap?, createdby, sourcetext} - roomid: the task's channelid unless the text names another room. - eventtypes: map the intent to plane types (message.created, reaction.added, artifact.updated, mem…

      Compile (LLM-side — you): produce a draft dict:roomid: the task's channelid unless the text names another room.eventtypes: map the intent to plane types (message.created,
    2. 02

      Files

      Test: python3 tests/observe-policy.test.py (99% module coverage).

      observepolicy.py — validation, standing-approval evaluator,Store records: obs.json, states draft → active → cancelled/expired,- observepolicy.py — validation, standing-approval evaluator, SubscriptionStore (/state/observe/), effect-card renderer (plain text always; A2UI choice-group in the real renderer contract behind includea2ui). - Store re…

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score67/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars359SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    sonichi/sutando
    Skill path
    skills/observe/SKILL.md
    Commit
    6a8f0fccd32e5aa620a3572c8885544f144bb6fe
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    /observe — NL → observation policy (MVP step 1)

    The owner (or a scoped user) says what they want watched, in natural language:

    /observe watch doc changes in this room and ping me daily
    

    The core agent COMPILES that into a structured draft; everything deterministic around the compilation lives in observe_policy.py. Design + resolved decisions: workspace notes/observe-mvp-slice-design.md.

    Processing convention (core agent, on an /observe <text> owner task)

    1. Compile (LLM-side — you): produce a draft dict: {room_id, event_types[], mode, cost_cap?, created_by, source_text}
      • room_id: the task's channel_id unless the text names another room.
      • event_types: map the intent to plane types (message.created, reaction.added, artifact.updated, member.joined, …). Unknown intent → ask, don't guess.
      • mode: observe (context only) | record (journal) | notify (ping the owner) | taskify (promote batches to ambient tasks — never standing-approved).
    2. Validate: observe_policy.validate_draft(draft) — errors go back to the user verbatim; do not "fix" a draft silently.
    3. Standing approval: evaluate_standing_approval(rec, owner_mxid=…, owner_rooms=…). owner_rooms = rooms the owner OWNS — created by the owner or where the owner holds PL≥50 (checked via the room state the core already has; when ownership is unknown, the room is NOT in scope). Familiarity — "the owner sent a task from here" — is NOT ownership: a shared room must never enter standing-approval scope (001 review; the server's four-way authz still gates the subscribe, but the standing-approval semantic is stricter by design). True → save + transition(id, "active") + subscribe + post the AUTO-ACTIVATED card (visibility is mandatory — never activate silently). False → save draft + post the CONFIRM card and wait for the decision.
    4. Decision grammar (same infrastructure as human-action cards): policy <id> activate | edit <new text> | cancel — typed reply, reaction on the card, or (when custom-event fan-out lands) an A2UI button. edit recompiles with the new text into the SAME policy id.
    5. Subscribe on activate: events client subscribe(room_id, event_types) — the events plane's four-way authz is the permission evaluator; a subscribe rejection (e.g. PL too low) goes back to the user as the card's failure line, not swallowed.
    6. Enforcement: active notify/record/taskify policies are consumed by the sparrow drain handlers (taskify today; notify/record handlers are the next slice). cost_cap shows the CAP on cards; metering is a later slice.

    Files

    • observe_policy.py — validation, standing-approval evaluator, SubscriptionStore (<workspace>/state/observe/), effect-card renderer (plain text always; A2UI choice-group in the real renderer contract behind include_a2ui).
    • Store records: obs_*.json, states draft → active → cancelled/expired, terminal states immutable, every transition audited.

    Test: python3 tests/observe-policy.test.py (99% module coverage).