Source profileQuality 81/100

dyoshikawa/rulesync/.rulesync/skills/post-review-comments/SKILL.md

post-review-comments

Post line-level review comments and an overall review comment on a PR in English with a natural, concise writing style

Source repository stars
1,263
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Read the PR diff and description to understand:

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/dyoshikawa/rulesync --skill ".rulesync/skills/post-review-comments"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "post-review-comments" from https://github.com/dyoshikawa/rulesync/blob/310b711fbe8cffc14debb276ade8a384c2b89083/.rulesync/skills/post-review-comments/SKILL.md at commit 310b711fbe8cffc14debb276ade8a384c2b89083. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Step 1: Understand the PR

      Read the PR diff and description to understand:

      What changed and whyThe scope and impact of the changesRead the PR diff and description to understand:
    2. 02

      Step 2: Prepare Line-Level Comments

      Identify specific lines in the diff that deserve feedback — bugs, potential issues, style concerns, suggestions for improvement, or questions about intent.

      The file pathThe line number (in the new version of the file)Your comment text
    3. 03

      Step 3: Prepare an Overall Review Comment

      Write a brief overall assessment of the PR. This is a summary-level comment, not a repeat of line-level feedback.

      Write a brief overall assessment of the PR. This is a summary-level comment, not a repeat of line-level feedback.
    4. 04

      Step 4: Post the Review

      Use a single gh api call to submit both line-level comments and the overall comment together as one review:

      Use a single gh api call to submit both line-level comments and the overall comment together as one review:Each line comment requires: path, line (line number in the diff's new file), and body.If you have no line-level comments, fall back to:

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score81/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars1,263SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    dyoshikawa/rulesync
    Skill path
    .rulesync/skills/post-review-comments/SKILL.md
    Commit
    310b711fbe8cffc14debb276ade8a384c2b89083
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    target_pr = the user's request

    If target_pr is not provided, use the PR of the current branch.

    Step 1: Understand the PR

    Read the PR diff and description to understand:

    • What changed and why
    • The scope and impact of the changes

    Step 2: Prepare Line-Level Comments

    Identify specific lines in the diff that deserve feedback — bugs, potential issues, style concerns, suggestions for improvement, or questions about intent.

    For each comment, note:

    • The file path
    • The line number (in the new version of the file)
    • Your comment text

    Step 3: Prepare an Overall Review Comment

    Write a brief overall assessment of the PR. This is a summary-level comment, not a repeat of line-level feedback.

    Step 4: Post the Review

    Use a single gh api call to submit both line-level comments and the overall comment together as one review:

    gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/reviews \
      --method POST \
      -f event="COMMENT" \
      -f body="<overall comment>" \
      -f 'comments[]={...}' ...
    

    Each line comment requires: path, line (line number in the diff's new file), and body.

    If you have no line-level comments, fall back to:

    gh pr review <pr_number> --comment --body "<overall comment>"
    

    Writing Style

    Write in English only.

    Style guidelines — write like a human teammate, not a bot:

    • Use plain paragraphs. Avoid headings (##), horizontal rules (---), and excessive bullet lists.
    • Keep it conversational and direct. Say what matters, skip the filler.
    • Do not use phrases like "Great work!" or "LGTM!" unless you genuinely mean it and have nothing else to add.
    • Be honest. If something looks off, say so clearly but respectfully.
    • Short is fine. A two-sentence comment is better than a five-paragraph essay with no substance.

    Step 5: Report

    Output the PR number, a count of line-level comments posted, and a brief summary of the overall comment.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 10042,015

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    ab-testing

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

    Computed 10042,015

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    churn-prevention

    When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o

    Computed 997

    event4u-app/agent-config

    design-review

    Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.

    Computed 9831,966

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    dask

    Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.