Source profileQuality 86/100

github/awesome-copilot/skills/prd/SKILL.md

prd

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

Source repository stars
37,126
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Generate high-quality Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) for software systems and AI-powered features. Includes executive summaries, user stories, technical specifications, and risk analysis.

Best for

  • Starting a new product or feature development cycle
  • Translating a vague idea into a concrete technical specification
  • Defining requirements for AI-powered features

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/prd"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "prd" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/prd/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Operational Workflow

    Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps. Do not assume context.

    The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?
  2. 02

    Phase 1: Discovery (The Interview)

    Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps. Do not assume context.

    The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?
  3. 03

    Phase 2: Analysis & Scoping

    Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.

    Map out the User Flow.Define Non-Goals to protect the timeline.Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.
  4. 04

    Phase 3: Technical Drafting

    Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.

    Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.
  5. 05

    Implementation Guidelines

    Define Testing: For AI systems, specify how to test and validate output quality.

    Define Testing: For AI systems, specify how to test and validate output quality.Iterate: Present a draft and ask for feedback on specific sections.Skip Discovery: Never write a PRD without asking at least 2 clarifying questions first.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score86/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars37,126SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
github/awesome-copilot
Skill path
skills/prd/SKILL.md
Commit
9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Product Requirements Document (PRD)

Overview

Design comprehensive, production-grade Product Requirements Documents (PRDs) that bridge the gap between business vision and technical execution. This skill works for modern software systems, ensuring that requirements are clearly defined.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Starting a new product or feature development cycle
  • Translating a vague idea into a concrete technical specification
  • Defining requirements for AI-powered features
  • Stakeholders need a unified "source of truth" for project scope
  • User asks to "write a PRD", "document requirements", or "plan a feature"

Operational Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery (The Interview)

Before writing a single line of the PRD, you MUST interrogate the user to fill knowledge gaps. Do not assume context.

Ask about:

  • The Core Problem: Why are we building this now?
  • Success Metrics: How do we know it worked?
  • Constraints: Budget, tech stack, or deadline?

Phase 2: Analysis & Scoping

Synthesize the user's input. Identify dependencies and hidden complexities.

  • Map out the User Flow.
  • Define Non-Goals to protect the timeline.

Phase 3: Technical Drafting

Generate the document using the Strict PRD Schema below.


PRD Quality Standards

Requirements Quality

Use concrete, measurable criteria. Avoid "fast", "easy", or "intuitive".

# Vague (BAD)
- The search should be fast and return relevant results.
- The UI must look modern and be easy to use.

# Concrete (GOOD)
+ The search must return results within 200ms for a 10k record dataset.
+ The search algorithm must achieve >= 85% Precision@10 in benchmark evals.
+ The UI must follow the 'Vercel/Next.js' design system and achieve 100% Lighthouse Accessibility score.

Strict PRD Schema

You MUST follow this exact structure for the output:

1. Executive Summary

  • Problem Statement: 1-2 sentences on the pain point.
  • Proposed Solution: 1-2 sentences on the fix.
  • Success Criteria: 3-5 measurable KPIs.

2. User Experience & Functionality

  • User Personas: Who is this for?
  • User Stories: As a [user], I want to [action] so that [benefit].
  • Acceptance Criteria: Bulleted list of "Done" definitions for each story.
  • Non-Goals: What are we NOT building?

3. AI System Requirements (If Applicable)

  • Tool Requirements: What tools and APIs are needed?
  • Evaluation Strategy: How to measure output quality and accuracy.

4. Technical Specifications

  • Architecture Overview: Data flow and component interaction.
  • Integration Points: APIs, DBs, and Auth.
  • Security & Privacy: Data handling and compliance.

5. Risks & Roadmap

  • Phased Rollout: MVP -> v1.1 -> v2.0.
  • Technical Risks: Latency, cost, or dependency failures.

Implementation Guidelines

DO (Always)

  • Define Testing: For AI systems, specify how to test and validate output quality.
  • Iterate: Present a draft and ask for feedback on specific sections.

DON'T (Avoid)

  • Skip Discovery: Never write a PRD without asking at least 2 clarifying questions first.
  • Hallucinate Constraints: If the user didn't specify a tech stack, ask or label it as TBD.

Example: Intelligent Search System

1. Executive Summary

Problem: Users struggle to find specific documentation snippets in massive repositories. Solution: An intelligent search system that provides direct answers with source citations. Success:

  • Reduce search time by 50%.
  • Citation accuracy >= 95%.

2. User Stories

  • Story: As a developer, I want to ask natural language questions so I don't have to guess keywords.
  • AC:
    • Supports multi-turn clarification.
    • Returns code blocks with "Copy" button.

3. AI System Architecture

  • Tools Required: codesearch, grep, webfetch.

4. Evaluation

  • Benchmark: Test with 50 common developer questions.
  • Pass Rate: 90% must match expected citations.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing