Source profileQuality 75/100Review permissions

wshobson/agents/plugins/review-agent-governance/skills/review-agent-setup/SKILL.md

review-agent-setup

Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.

Source repository stars
38,313
Declared platforms
1
Static risk flags
2
Last source update
2026-07-22
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt.

Best for

  • Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (gh pr review, gh pr merge)
  • Triages issues (gh issue comment, gh issue close)
  • Publishes releases (gh release create)

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeDeclaredSource recordInstall path and trigger
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/wshobson/agents --skill "plugins/review-agent-governance/skills/review-agent-setup"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "review-agent-setup" from https://github.com/wshobson/agents/blob/c4b82b0ad771190355eb8e204b1329732a18449a/plugins/review-agent-governance/skills/review-agent-setup/SKILL.md at commit c4b82b0ad771190355eb8e204b1329732a18449a. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    One-time setup

    You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See ../agents/review-policy-author.md for guidance on authoring review policies.

    You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See ../agents/review-policy-author.md for guidance on authoring review policies.The first invocation of protect-mcp sign will create the key. Commit the public key from the first receipt so auditors can verify later.
  2. 02

    Per-session workflow

    The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after.

    The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after.
  3. 03

    Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge

    Review the “Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge” source section.
  4. 04

    Example: approving a PR review

    Review the “Example: approving a PR review” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Example: approving a PR review” source section.
  5. 05

    When to use this plugin

    Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent:

    Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (gh pr review, gh pr merge)Triages issues (gh issue comment, gh issue close)Publishes releases (gh release create)

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Writes files

medium · line 37

The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.

You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See

Writes files

medium · line 41

The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.

### 3. Create a receipts directory and sign key

Runs scripts

medium · line 102

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

npx @veritasacta/verify ./review-receipts/*.json

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score75/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars38,313SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility1 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
wshobson/agents
Skill path
plugins/review-agent-governance/skills/review-agent-setup/SKILL.md
Commit
c4b82b0ad771190355eb8e204b1329732a18449a
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

review-agent-governance — Setup

Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt.

When to use this plugin

Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent:

  • Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (gh pr review, gh pr merge)
  • Triages issues (gh issue comment, gh issue close)
  • Publishes releases (gh release create)
  • Modifies CI configuration (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml)
  • Pushes to protected branches (main, master, release, production)
  • Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord)

If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use protect-mcp for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one.

One-time setup

1. Install the plugin

claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance

2. Copy the default policy to your project

cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \
   ./review-governance.cedar

You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See ../agents/review-policy-author.md for guidance on authoring review policies.

3. Create a receipts directory and sign key

mkdir -p ./review-receipts
echo "./review-receipts/" >> .gitignore
echo "./review-governance.key" >> .gitignore
echo "./.review-approved" >> .gitignore

The first invocation of protect-mcp sign will create the key. Commit the public key from the first receipt so auditors can verify later.

Per-session workflow

The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after.

Flag file (simplest)

# Before the action you want to approve
touch ./.review-approved

# Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge

# Immediately after
rm ./.review-approved

Slash command (from within Claude Code)

/approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X"

This creates ./.review-approved with the given reason embedded as a note, and writes a human-approved receipt to the chain. A follow-up rm is still needed to close the window.

Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation)

If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass:

export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approve

Any tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run.

Verifying the chain

List all receipts:

ls -la ./review-receipts/

Verify the entire chain offline:

npx @veritasacta/verify ./review-receipts/*.json

Exit 0 means every receipt is authentic and the chain is intact. Exit 1 means one receipt has been tampered with. Exit 2 means a receipt is malformed.

Look at recent denials:

/list-pending

Within Claude Code this slash command walks the receipt chain and prints any recent decision: deny entries with the tool name, command pattern, and timestamp.

Example: approving a PR review

# 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment
$ /list-pending
  Recent denials:
  - 2026-04-17T14:23:01Z  Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'"
  - 2026-04-17T14:23:02Z  Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'"

# 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it
$ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection"
  ./.review-approved created

# 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds
$ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM"
  [receipt: rec_XXX, decision=allow, reason=human_approved]

# 4. Human closes the window
$ rm ./.review-approved

Every step is in the receipt chain. The chain is offline-verifiable for regulators, counterparties, or downstream auditors who want to confirm that no review action bypassed the human gate.

Composing with protect-mcp

If both plugins are installed, run them side by side:

{
  "hooks": {
    "PreToolUse": [
      {
        "matcher": ".*",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 evaluate --policy ./protect.cedar --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --fail-on-missing-policy false"
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "matcher": ".*",
        "hooks": [
          {
            "type": "command",
            "command": "if [ -f ./.review-approved ]; then exit 0; fi; npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 evaluate --policy ./review-governance.cedar --tool \"$TOOL_NAME\" --input \"$TOOL_INPUT\" --fail-on-missing-policy false"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it.

Standards

  • Ed25519 — RFC 8032 (digital signatures)
  • JCS — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization)
  • Cedar — AWS's open authorization policy language
  • IETF draftdraft-farley-acta-signed-receipts

Alternatives

Compare before choosing