Source profileQuality 93/100

github/awesome-copilot/skills/salesforce-apex-quality/SKILL.md

salesforce-apex-quality

Apex code quality guardrails for Salesforce development. Enforces bulk-safety rules (no SOQL/DML in loops), sharing model requirements, CRUD/FLS security, SOQL injection prevention, PNB test coverage (Positive / Negative / Bulk), and modern Apex idioms. Use this skill when reviewing or generating Apex classes, trigger handlers, batch jobs, or test classes to catch governor limit risks, security gaps, and quality issues before deployment.

Source repository stars
37,126
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Apply these checks to every Apex class, trigger, and test file you write or review.

Best for

  • Use this skill when reviewing or generating Apex classes, trigger handlers, batch jobs, or test classes to catch governor limit risks, security gaps, and quality issues before deployment.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/salesforce-apex-quality"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "salesforce-apex-quality" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/salesforce-apex-quality/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Step 1 — Governor Limit Safety Check

    Scan for these patterns before declaring any Apex file acceptable:

    Scan for these patterns before declaring any Apex file acceptable:Rule: if you see [SELECT or Database.query, insert, update, delete, upsert, merge inside a for loop body — stop and refactor before proceeding.
  2. 02

    Step 2 — Sharing Model Verification

    Every class must declare its sharing intent explicitly. Undeclared sharing inherits from the caller — unpredictable behaviour.

    Every class must declare its sharing intent explicitly. Undeclared sharing inherits from the caller — unpredictable behaviour.If a class does not have one of these three declarations, add it before writing anything else.
  3. 03

    Step 3 — CRUD / FLS Enforcement

    Apex code that reads or writes records on behalf of a user must verify object and field access. The platform does not enforce FLS or CRUD automatically in Apex.

    Apex code that reads or writes records on behalf of a user must verify object and field access. The platform does not enforce FLS or CRUD automatically in Apex.Rule: any Apex method callable from a UI component, REST endpoint, or @InvocableMethod must enforce CRUD/FLS. Internal service methods called only from trusted contexts may use with sharing instead.
  4. 04

    Step 4 — SOQL Injection Prevention

    Review the “Step 4 — SOQL Injection Prevention” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Step 4 — SOQL Injection Prevention” source section.
  5. 05

    Step 5 — Modern Apex Idioms

    Prefer current language features (API 62.0 / Winter '25+):

    Prefer current language features (API 62.0 / Winter '25+):

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score93/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars37,126SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
github/awesome-copilot
Skill path
skills/salesforce-apex-quality/SKILL.md
Commit
9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Salesforce Apex Quality Guardrails

Apply these checks to every Apex class, trigger, and test file you write or review.

Step 1 — Governor Limit Safety Check

Scan for these patterns before declaring any Apex file acceptable:

SOQL and DML in Loops — Automatic Fail

// ❌ NEVER — causes LimitException at scale
for (Account a : accounts) {
    List<Contact> contacts = [SELECT Id FROM Contact WHERE AccountId = :a.Id]; // SOQL in loop
    update a; // DML in loop
}

// ✅ ALWAYS — collect, then query/update once
Set<Id> accountIds = new Map<Id, Account>(accounts).keySet();
Map<Id, List<Contact>> contactsByAccount = new Map<Id, List<Contact>>();
for (Contact c : [SELECT Id, AccountId FROM Contact WHERE AccountId IN :accountIds]) {
    if (!contactsByAccount.containsKey(c.AccountId)) {
        contactsByAccount.put(c.AccountId, new List<Contact>());
    }
    contactsByAccount.get(c.AccountId).add(c);
}
update accounts; // DML once, outside the loop

Rule: if you see [SELECT or Database.query, insert, update, delete, upsert, merge inside a for loop body — stop and refactor before proceeding.

Step 2 — Sharing Model Verification

Every class must declare its sharing intent explicitly. Undeclared sharing inherits from the caller — unpredictable behaviour.

DeclarationWhen to use
public with sharing class FooDefault for all service, handler, selector, and controller classes
public without sharing class FooOnly when the class must run elevated (e.g. system-level logging, trigger bypass). Requires a code comment explaining why.
public inherited sharing class FooFramework entry points that should respect the caller's sharing context

If a class does not have one of these three declarations, add it before writing anything else.

Step 3 — CRUD / FLS Enforcement

Apex code that reads or writes records on behalf of a user must verify object and field access. The platform does not enforce FLS or CRUD automatically in Apex.

// Check before querying a field
if (!Schema.sObjectType.Contact.fields.Email.isAccessible()) {
    throw new System.NoAccessException();
}

// Or use WITH USER_MODE in SOQL (API 56.0+)
List<Contact> contacts = [SELECT Id, Email FROM Contact WHERE AccountId = :accId WITH USER_MODE];

// Or use Database.query with AccessLevel
List<Contact> contacts = Database.query('SELECT Id, Email FROM Contact', AccessLevel.USER_MODE);

Rule: any Apex method callable from a UI component, REST endpoint, or @InvocableMethod must enforce CRUD/FLS. Internal service methods called only from trusted contexts may use with sharing instead.

Step 4 — SOQL Injection Prevention

// ❌ NEVER — concatenates user input into SOQL string
String soql = 'SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name = \'' + userInput + '\'';

// ✅ ALWAYS — bind variable
String soql = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Name = :userInput];

// ✅ For dynamic SOQL with user-controlled field names — validate against a whitelist
Set<String> allowedFields = new Set<String>{'Name', 'Industry', 'AnnualRevenue'};
if (!allowedFields.contains(userInput)) {
    throw new IllegalArgumentException('Field not permitted: ' + userInput);
}

Step 5 — Modern Apex Idioms

Prefer current language features (API 62.0 / Winter '25+):

Old patternModern replacement
if (obj != null) { x = obj.Field__c; }x = obj?.Field__c;
x = (y != null) ? y : defaultVal;x = y ?? defaultVal;
System.assertEquals(expected, actual)Assert.areEqual(expected, actual)
System.assert(condition)Assert.isTrue(condition)
[SELECT ... WHERE ...] with no sharing context[SELECT ... WHERE ... WITH USER_MODE]

Step 6 — PNB Test Coverage Checklist

Every feature must be tested across all three paths. Missing any one of these is a quality failure:

Positive Path

  • Expected input → expected output.
  • Assert the exact field values, record counts, or return values — not just that no exception was thrown.

Negative Path

  • Invalid input, null values, empty collections, and error conditions.
  • Assert that exceptions are thrown with the correct type and message.
  • Assert that no records were mutated when the operation should have failed cleanly.

Bulk Path

  • Insert/update/delete 200–251 records in a single test transaction.
  • Assert that all records processed correctly — no partial failures from governor limits.
  • Use Test.startTest() / Test.stopTest() to isolate governor limit counters for async work.

Test Class Rules

@isTest(SeeAllData=false)   // Required — no exceptions without a documented reason
private class AccountServiceTest {

    @TestSetup
    static void makeData() {
        // Create all test data here — use a factory if one exists in the project
    }

    @isTest
    static void givenValidInput_whenProcessAccounts_thenFieldsUpdated() {
        // Positive path
        List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account LIMIT 10];
        Test.startTest();
        AccountService.processAccounts(accounts);
        Test.stopTest();
        // Assert meaningful outcomes — not just no exception
        List<Account> updated = [SELECT Status__c FROM Account WHERE Id IN :accounts];
        Assert.areEqual('Processed', updated[0].Status__c, 'Status should be Processed');
    }
}

Step 7 — Trigger Architecture Checklist

  • One trigger per object. If a second trigger exists, consolidate into the handler.
  • Trigger body contains only: context checks, handler invocation, and routing logic.
  • No business logic, SOQL, or DML directly in the trigger body.
  • If a trigger framework (Trigger Actions Framework, ff-apex-common, custom base class) is already in use — extend it. Do not create a parallel pattern.
  • Handler class is with sharing unless the trigger requires elevated access.

Quick Reference — Hardcoded Anti-Patterns Summary

PatternAction
SOQL inside for loopRefactor: query before the loop, operate on collections
DML inside for loopRefactor: collect mutations, DML once after the loop
Class missing sharing declarationAdd with sharing (or document why without sharing)
escape="false" on user data (VF)Remove — auto-escaping enforces XSS prevention
Empty catch blockAdd logging and appropriate re-throw or error handling
String-concatenated SOQL with user inputReplace with bind variable or whitelist validation
Test with no assertionAdd a meaningful Assert.* call
System.assert / System.assertEquals styleUpgrade to Assert.isTrue / Assert.areEqual
Hardcoded record ID ('001...')Replace with queried or inserted test record ID

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9531,966

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

simpy

Build, inspect, test, and analyze bounded process-based discrete-event simulations with SimPy, including events, resources, interrupts, monitoring, replications, warm-up, and reproducible output analysis.

Computed 9337,126

github/awesome-copilot

flowstudio-power-automate-build

Build, scaffold, and deploy Power Automate cloud flows using the FlowStudio MCP server. Your agent constructs flow definitions, wires connections, deploys, and tests — all via MCP without opening the portal. Load this skill when asked to: create a flow, build a new flow, deploy a flow definition, scaffold a Power Automate workflow, construct a flow JSON, update an existing flow's actions, patch a flow definition, add actions to a flow, wire up connections, or generate a workflow definition from

Computed 9245

griffinwork40/agent-afk

ship

Release pipeline for already-done local work. Dispatches /ground-state pre-flight, runs the project test suite, drafts a commit message, pushes, and opens a PR with a structured verification summary. Use when local changes are ready to hand off to review — e.g. 'ship this', 'push and open a PR', 'release this work'. Add --verify to trigger an adversarial verifier wave on the diff before a human reads the PR.

Computed 91262,331

obra/superpowers

writing-skills

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment