K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/skills/shap/SKILL.md
shap
Explain and audit machine-learning predictions with SHAP. Use for selecting SHAP explainers and maskers, computing and validating feature attributions, handling multi-output explanations, and producing local or global SHAP visualizations.
- Source repository stars
- 31,966
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-28
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Use SHAP to describe how a fitted predictive model maps inputs to outputs. Work from the modern shap.Explanation API, make the explained output and background distribution explicit, and validate every explanation before interpreting it.
Not for
- Print Python, SHAP, model-library, NumPy, and framework versions.
- Verify the model receives exactly the same transformed columns, order, dtype, and missing-value representation used during fitting.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill "skills/shap"Inspect the Agent Skill "shap" from https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/blob/e7ac42510774624f327003c95b6650e2883bc01d/skills/shap/SKILL.md at commit e7ac42510774624f327003c95b6650e2883bc01d. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Standard Workflow
For classifiers, decide whether the task needs raw margins or probabilities. Defaults differ by model family; never infer units from the plot color or sign.
model and preprocessing version;exact callable or model method being explained;output name/index and units; - 02
Operating Rules
1. Explain a fixed, evaluated model; do not use SHAP as a substitute for predictive validation. 2. Use held-out or clearly labeled analysis rows for explanations. Choose background rows only from an appropriate training or reference population. 3. State the explained output: reg…
Explain a fixed, evaluated model; do not use SHAP as a substitute for predictive validation.Use held-out or clearly labeled analysis rows for explanations. Choose background rows only from an appropriate training or reference population.State the explained output: regression value, raw margin, probability, log loss, logit, or another model method. - 03
Install
Create an isolated environment and pin the documented release:
Create an isolated environment and pin the documented release:shap[plots] installs the plotting dependencies. Add the fitted model's package at a version compatible with the project. For older Python compatibility, read references/migration.md instead of silently installing a diff…Confirm the environment before debugging an API mismatch: - 04
1. Define the explanation target
For classifiers, decide whether the task needs raw margins or probabilities. Defaults differ by model family; never infer units from the plot color or sign.
model and preprocessing version;exact callable or model method being explained;output name/index and units; - 05
2. Select an explainer and masker
Start with shap.Explainer(model, masker) when automatic dispatch is sufficient. Instantiate a specialized explainer when its assumptions or output controls matter.
Start with shap.Explainer(model, masker) when automatic dispatch is sufficient. Instantiate a specialized explainer when its assumptions or output controls matter.Use the detailed decision guide in references/explainers.md. Use references/data-maskers.md when features are correlated, structured, sparse, or semantically grouped.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 85/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 31,966 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
- Skill path
- skills/shap/SKILL.md
- Commit
- e7ac42510774624f327003c95b6650e2883bc01d
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
SHAP
Use SHAP to describe how a fitted predictive model maps inputs to outputs. Work from the modern shap.Explanation API, make the explained output and background distribution explicit, and validate every explanation before interpreting it.
This skill is aligned with SHAP 0.52.0 (released 2026-05-28). That release requires Python 3.12 or newer.
Operating Rules
- Explain a fixed, evaluated model; do not use SHAP as a substitute for predictive validation.
- Use held-out or clearly labeled analysis rows for explanations. Choose background rows only from an appropriate training or reference population.
- State the explained output: regression value, raw margin, probability, log loss, logit, or another model method.
- Keep explanations as
shap.Explanationobjects. Callexplainer(X); use.shap_values(X)only when maintaining legacy code. - For multi-output models, select one output before using tabular plots:
explanation[..., output_index]. - Check
base_values + values.sum(...)against the exact model output being explained. - Treat SHAP as a description of model behavior under a masking/background choice. It does not establish causality, fairness, recourse, or scientific mechanism.
- Never silence an additivity failure until input shape, preprocessing, model version, output space, and row ordering have been checked.
- Do not load untrusted pickle, joblib, model, or explainer artifacts; those formats can execute code during deserialization.
Install
Create an isolated environment and pin the documented release:
uv venv --python 3.12
source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install "shap[plots]==0.52.0"
shap[plots] installs the plotting dependencies. Add the fitted model's package at a version compatible with the project. For older Python compatibility, read references/migration.md instead of silently installing a different SHAP release.
Confirm the environment before debugging an API mismatch:
import platform
import shap
print("Python:", platform.python_version())
print("SHAP:", shap.__version__)
Standard Workflow
1. Define the explanation target
Record:
- model and preprocessing version;
- exact callable or model method being explained;
- output name/index and units;
- evaluation rows;
- background/reference population;
- masker and explainer algorithm;
- SHAP and model-library versions.
For classifiers, decide whether the task needs raw margins or probabilities. Defaults differ by model family; never infer units from the plot color or sign.
2. Select an explainer and masker
Start with shap.Explainer(model, masker) when automatic dispatch is sufficient. Instantiate a specialized explainer when its assumptions or output controls matter.
| Situation | Preferred choice | Important constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Supported tree ensemble | TreeExplainer | model_output="probability" and "log_loss" require interventional masking and background data |
| Linear model | LinearExplainer | The masker determines interventional versus correlation-aware behavior |
| Small feature space | ExactExplainer | Cost grows quickly with unconstrained feature count |
| General tabular callable | PermutationExplainer | Budget at least one full forward/reverse permutation |
| Hierarchical feature groups, text, or image | PartitionExplainer | The partition tree changes the cooperative game |
| Differentiable neural network | DeepExplainer or GradientExplainer | Framework support, output shape, and background choice require testing |
| Legacy Kernel SHAP workflow | KernelExplainer | Usually much slower than model-specific methods |
Use the detailed decision guide in references/explainers.md. Use references/data-maskers.md when features are correlated, structured, sparse, or semantically grouped.
3. Compute a modern Explanation
This complete binary-classification example uses an explicit background and selects the positive-class output:
import numpy as np
import shap
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
X, y = load_breast_cancer(as_frame=True, return_X_y=True)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X,
y,
test_size=0.2,
stratify=y,
random_state=7,
)
model = RandomForestClassifier(
n_estimators=200,
min_samples_leaf=3,
random_state=7,
n_jobs=-1,
).fit(X_train, y_train)
background = shap.sample(X_train, 100, random_state=7)
explainer = shap.Explainer(model, background, algorithm="tree")
all_outputs = explainer(X_test)
# sklearn tree classifiers expose one output per class.
positive = all_outputs[..., 1]
assert positive.values.shape == X_test.shape
reconstructed = np.asarray(positive.base_values) + positive.values.sum(axis=1)
expected = model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]
np.testing.assert_allclose(reconstructed, expected, rtol=1e-5, atol=1e-6)
shap.plots.beeswarm(positive, max_display=15)
shap.plots.waterfall(positive[0], max_display=15)
Output shape is model-dependent:
- one tabular output:
(samples, features); - multiple tabular outputs:
(samples, features, outputs); - multiple model inputs: often a list of arrays or explanations;
- image/text explanations: feature axes follow the input representation, with output selection on the final axis when present.
Do not use the pre-0.45 pattern values[class_index] for a modern multi-output array. Use values[..., class_index] or slice the Explanation itself.
4. Control tree output semantics when needed
For a supported tree classifier, probability-space explanations must be explicit:
background = shap.sample(X_train, 200, random_state=7)
explainer = shap.TreeExplainer(
model,
data=background,
feature_perturbation="interventional",
model_output="probability",
)
probability_exp = explainer(X_test)
In SHAP 0.52:
feature_perturbation="auto"uses interventional semantics when background data is supplied and tree-path-dependent semantics otherwise;- probability and log-loss output modes are supported only with interventional semantics;
- pass
approximate=Truetoexplainer(X, approximate=True)if deliberately using the lower-fidelity tree approximation; do not pass it to the constructor.
5. Use a model-agnostic callable deliberately
Pass the exact callable whose outputs will be interpreted:
masker = shap.maskers.Independent(background, max_samples=100)
explainer = shap.Explainer(
model.predict_proba,
masker,
algorithm="permutation",
output_names=[str(label) for label in model.classes_],
seed=7,
)
budget = 2 * X_test.shape[1] + 1
all_outputs = explainer(X_test.iloc[:20], max_evals=budget)
positive = all_outputs[..., 1]
Increase max_evals to average over more permutations when estimates are unstable. Keep the seed, background sample, and evaluation budget in the report.
6. Visualize the question, not merely the available plot
| Question | Plot |
|---|---|
| Which features have the largest average attribution magnitude? | shap.plots.bar(exp) |
| How do direction, magnitude, and observed values vary globally? | shap.plots.beeswarm(exp) |
| Why did one prediction differ from its baseline? | shap.plots.waterfall(exp[i]) |
| How does one feature's attribution vary over its values? | shap.plots.scatter(exp[:, feature]) |
| Do explanations form sample-level patterns? | shap.plots.heatmap(exp) |
| How do predefined cohorts differ descriptively? | shap.plots.bar(exp.cohorts(labels).abs.mean(0)) |
| Which tokens or image regions contribute to an output? | shap.plots.text(exp) or shap.plots.image(exp) |
Read references/plots.md before customizing or saving figures.
7. Report limitations with results
At minimum, report:
- output and units;
- baseline/reference population;
- explainer and masker;
- sample count and selection;
- output index/name;
- additivity error or applicable approximation diagnostics;
- known correlated/grouped features;
- whether results are local, aggregated, or cohort-specific;
- a clear non-causal statement.
Common Tasks
Global and local analysis
Use global plots to locate important patterns, scatter plots to inspect those patterns, and local plots to investigate selected rows. Do not select only visually dramatic rows without documenting the selection rule.
Multiclass models
Set output_names where possible, inspect explanation.output_names, and slice an output before plotting:
class_exp = explanation[..., "class_name"]
# or
class_exp = explanation[..., class_index]
Never average signed attributions across classes. For cross-class comparison, preserve the same model, rows, background, output space, and aggregation.
Cohorts, subgroup analysis, and fairness
SHAP can compare how a model uses features across cohorts, but this is not a fairness test. A protected feature with small SHAP magnitude does not rule out proxy discrimination, and removing a protected feature does not establish fairness. Pair attribution analysis with performance, calibration, error-rate, and domain-appropriate fairness metrics.
See references/workflows.md for cohort construction, model comparison, error analysis, log-loss explanations, monitoring, and production records.
Text and images
Use domain maskers rather than treating tokens or pixels as ordinary independent columns:
shap.maskers.Text(tokenizer)withPartitionExplainerfor token groups;shap.maskers.Image(...)withPartitionExplainerfor image regions;- restrict expensive multi-output models with
outputs=....
Read references/modalities.md for current examples and output-shape guidance.
Troubleshooting Order
- Print Python, SHAP, model-library, NumPy, and framework versions.
- Verify the model receives exactly the same transformed columns, order, dtype, and missing-value representation used during fitting.
- Print
values.shape,base_values.shape,data.shape,feature_names, andoutput_names. - Confirm the selected output and output units.
- Recompute predictions on the same rows in the same order.
- Test a smaller batch and representative background.
- Only then investigate package-specific compatibility or approximation settings.
Use references/troubleshooting.md for additivity failures, shape mismatches, categorical features, pipelines, deep-learning frameworks, plotting, and performance.
Bundled Script
Run a deterministic, self-contained tabular example that writes importance data, metadata, and plots:
uv run --no-project --python 3.12 --with "shap[plots]==0.52.0" \
skills/shap/scripts/tabular_report.py --output-dir /tmp/shap-report
The script does not download data or deserialize models. Read it as a template, then replace the built-in dataset and model while preserving output selection and additivity validation.
Reference Map
| File | Load when |
|---|---|
| references/explainers.md | Selecting or configuring explainers |
| references/data-maskers.md | Choosing background data, masking semantics, or feature groups |
| references/plots.md | Selecting, composing, or saving visualizations |
| references/workflows.md | Running audits, comparisons, cohorts, monitoring, or production workflows |
| references/modalities.md | Explaining text, images, or deep models |
| references/migration.md | Updating legacy SHAP code or supporting older Python |
| references/theory.md | Explaining estimands, guarantees, dependence, interactions, and limitations |
| references/troubleshooting.md | Diagnosing runtime, shape, additivity, and compatibility problems |
Primary Sources
- Documentation: https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
- API reference: https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html
- Release notes: https://shap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/release_notes.html
- Repository: https://github.com/shap/shap
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
dask
Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
neurokit2
Use NeuroKit2 to build or audit reproducible research workflows for physiological time-series preprocessing, event/interval analysis, multimodal alignment, variability, and complexity. Trigger when code imports neurokit2 or needs its current APIs, schemas, and method-aware validation—not for diagnosis or device validation.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
biopython
Comprehensive molecular biology toolkit. Use for sequence manipulation, file parsing (FASTA/GenBank/PDB), phylogenetics, and programmatic NCBI/PubMed access (Bio.Entrez). Best for batch processing, custom bioinformatics pipelines, BLAST automation. For quick lookups use gget; for multi-service integration use bioservices.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
simpy
Build, inspect, test, and analyze bounded process-based discrete-event simulations with SimPy, including events, resources, interrupts, monitoring, replications, warm-up, and reproducible output analysis.