Source profileQuality 62/100

griffinwork40/agent-afk/src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/spec/SKILL.md

spec

Takes a loose idea and transforms it into a structured, actionable spec ready for implementation. Use when the user passes an idea, feature request, or problem description that needs scoping before building.

Source repository stars
45
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Before speccing, detect bug-shaped inputs: crashes, error stacks, regression reports ("worked yesterday", "used to work"), platform-specific failures ("broken on X", "doesn't work when…"), or user-report framing that implies root-cause-first (not design-first). If detected, stop…

Best for

  • Use when the user passes an idea, feature request, or problem description that needs scoping before building.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill "src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/spec"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "spec" from https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afk/blob/803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9/src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/spec/SKILL.md at commit 803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Triage: bugs route to /diagnose

    Before speccing, detect bug-shaped inputs: crashes, error stacks, regression reports ("worked yesterday", "used to work"), platform-specific failures ("broken on X", "doesn't work when…"), or user-report framing that implies root-cause-first (not design-first). If detected, stop…

    Before speccing, detect bug-shaped inputs: crashes, error stacks, regression reports ("worked yesterday", "used to work"), platform-specific failures ("broken on X", "doesn't work when…"), or user-report framing that im…Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel. One researches the web for prior art, comparable approaches, and patterns relevant to $ARGUMENT. The other inspects the local working directory for conventions, existing artifacts, a…Output schema by domain:
  2. 02

    Epistemic confidence

    Include an Epistemic confidence section at the end of every spec: summarize coverage gaps from research, flag claims that will be hard to verify, and note where human judgment will be needed.

    Include an Epistemic confidence section at the end of every spec: summarize coverage gaps from research, flag claims that will be hard to verify, and note where human judgment will be needed.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score62/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars45SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
griffinwork40/agent-afk
Skill path
src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/spec/SKILL.md
Commit
803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9
License
Apache-2.0
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Triage: bugs route to /diagnose

Before speccing, detect bug-shaped inputs: crashes, error stacks, regression reports ("worked yesterday", "used to work"), platform-specific failures ("broken on X", "doesn't work when…"), or user-report framing that implies root-cause-first (not design-first). If detected, stop and redirect: "This is a debugging task, not a spec task. Route to /diagnose instead — it will isolate the root cause, then /spec can scope the fix." Do not emit a spec.


Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel. One researches the web for prior art, comparable approaches, and patterns relevant to $ARGUMENT. The other inspects the local working directory for conventions, existing artifacts, and integration points relevant to the domain. When both return, synthesize a concise spec using the domain-appropriate schema below. Present to the user for confirmation before proceeding.

Output schema by domain:

DomainSpec fields
softwareproblem, goals, non-goals, approach, key decisions, interface, file plan, test plan, open questions
researchproblem, hypothesis, methodology, prior art positioning, expected results, publication plan, open questions
designproblem, user needs, constraints, solution space, prototype plan, success metrics, open questions
businessopportunity, risk analysis, competitive landscape, go/no-go criteria, resource plan, open questions
(other)problem, goals, non-goals, approach, key decisions, deliverables, validation plan, open questions

When domain is unspecified, infer from $ARGUMENT and the working directory. If ambiguous, use the generic (other) schema.

Epistemic confidence

Include an Epistemic confidence section at the end of every spec: summarize coverage gaps from research, flag claims that will be hard to verify, and note where human judgment will be needed.