Source profileQuality 79/100

affaan-m/ECC/.kiro/skills/agentic-engineering/SKILL.md

agentic-engineering

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

Source repository stars
234,327
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-27
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

Best for

  • Managing AI-driven development workflows
  • Planning agent task decomposition
  • Optimizing model tier selection

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/agentic-engineering"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "agentic-engineering" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/.kiro/skills/agentic-engineering/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Review Focus for AI-Generated Code

    Prioritize: - Invariants and edge cases - Error boundaries - Security and auth assumptions - Hidden coupling and rollout risk

    Invariants and edge casesError boundariesSecurity and auth assumptions
  2. 02

    Operating Principles

    1. Define completion criteria before execution. 2. Decompose work into agent-sized units. 3. Route model tiers by task complexity. 4. Measure with evals and regression checks.

    Define completion criteria before execution.Decompose work into agent-sized units.Route model tiers by task complexity.
  3. 03

    Eval-First Loop

    1. Define capability eval and regression eval. 2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures. 3. Execute implementation. 4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.

    Define capability eval and regression eval.Run baseline and capture failure signatures.Execute implementation.
  4. 04

    Task Decomposition

    Apply the 15-minute unit rule: - Each unit should be independently verifiable - Each unit should have a single dominant risk - Each unit should expose a clear done condition

    Each unit should be independently verifiableEach unit should have a single dominant riskEach unit should expose a clear done condition

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score79/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars234,327SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
affaan-m/ECC
Skill path
.kiro/skills/agentic-engineering/SKILL.md
Commit
4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38
License
MIT
Collected
2026-07-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Agentic Engineering

Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

Operating Principles

  1. Define completion criteria before execution.
  2. Decompose work into agent-sized units.
  3. Route model tiers by task complexity.
  4. Measure with evals and regression checks.

Eval-First Loop

  1. Define capability eval and regression eval.
  2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures.
  3. Execute implementation.
  4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.

Example workflow:

1. Write test that captures desired behavior (eval)
2. Run test → capture baseline failures
3. Implement feature
4. Re-run test → verify improvements
5. Check for regressions in other tests

Task Decomposition

Apply the 15-minute unit rule:

  • Each unit should be independently verifiable
  • Each unit should have a single dominant risk
  • Each unit should expose a clear done condition

Good decomposition:

Task: Add user authentication
├─ Unit 1: Add password hashing (15 min, security risk)
├─ Unit 2: Create login endpoint (15 min, API contract risk)
├─ Unit 3: Add session management (15 min, state risk)
└─ Unit 4: Protect routes with middleware (15 min, auth logic risk)

Bad decomposition:

Task: Add user authentication (2 hours, multiple risks)

Model Routing

Choose model tier based on task complexity:

  • Haiku: Classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits

    • Example: Rename variable, add type annotation, format code
  • Sonnet: Implementation and refactors

    • Example: Implement feature, refactor module, write tests
  • Opus: Architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants

    • Example: Design system, debug complex issue, review architecture

Cost discipline: Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.

Session Strategy

  • Continue session for closely-coupled units

    • Example: Implementing related functions in same module
  • Start fresh session after major phase transitions

    • Example: Moving from implementation to testing
  • Compact after milestone completion, not during active debugging

    • Example: After feature complete, before starting next feature

Review Focus for AI-Generated Code

Prioritize:

  • Invariants and edge cases
  • Error boundaries
  • Security and auth assumptions
  • Hidden coupling and rollout risk

Do not waste review cycles on style-only disagreements when automated format/lint already enforce style.

Review checklist:

  • Edge cases handled (null, empty, boundary values)
  • Error handling comprehensive
  • Security assumptions validated
  • No hidden coupling between modules
  • Rollout risk assessed (breaking changes, migrations)

Cost Discipline

Track per task:

  • Model tier used
  • Token estimate
  • Retries needed
  • Wall-clock time
  • Success/failure outcome

Example tracking:

Task: Implement user login
Model: Sonnet
Tokens: ~5k input, ~2k output
Retries: 1 (initial implementation had auth bug)
Time: 8 minutes
Outcome: Success

When to Use This Skill

  • Managing AI-driven development workflows
  • Planning agent task decomposition
  • Optimizing model tier selection
  • Implementing eval-first development
  • Reviewing AI-generated code
  • Tracking development costs

Integration with Other Skills

  • tdd-workflow: Combine with eval-first loop for test-driven development
  • verification-loop: Use for continuous validation during implementation
  • search-first: Apply before implementation to find existing solutions
  • coding-standards: Reference during code review phase

Alternatives

Compare before choosing