Best for
- Managing AI-driven development workflows
- Planning agent task decomposition
- Optimizing model tier selection
affaan-m/ECC/.kiro/skills/agentic-engineering/SKILL.md
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
Decision brief
Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/agentic-engineering"Inspect the Agent Skill "agentic-engineering" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/.kiro/skills/agentic-engineering/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Prioritize: - Invariants and edge cases - Error boundaries - Security and auth assumptions - Hidden coupling and rollout risk
1. Define completion criteria before execution. 2. Decompose work into agent-sized units. 3. Route model tiers by task complexity. 4. Measure with evals and regression checks.
1. Define capability eval and regression eval. 2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures. 3. Execute implementation. 4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.
Apply the 15-minute unit rule: - Each unit should be independently verifiable - Each unit should have a single dominant risk - Each unit should expose a clear done condition
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 79/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
Example workflow:
1. Write test that captures desired behavior (eval)
2. Run test → capture baseline failures
3. Implement feature
4. Re-run test → verify improvements
5. Check for regressions in other tests
Apply the 15-minute unit rule:
Good decomposition:
Task: Add user authentication
├─ Unit 1: Add password hashing (15 min, security risk)
├─ Unit 2: Create login endpoint (15 min, API contract risk)
├─ Unit 3: Add session management (15 min, state risk)
└─ Unit 4: Protect routes with middleware (15 min, auth logic risk)
Bad decomposition:
Task: Add user authentication (2 hours, multiple risks)
Choose model tier based on task complexity:
Haiku: Classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits
Sonnet: Implementation and refactors
Opus: Architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants
Cost discipline: Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.
Continue session for closely-coupled units
Start fresh session after major phase transitions
Compact after milestone completion, not during active debugging
Prioritize:
Do not waste review cycles on style-only disagreements when automated format/lint already enforce style.
Review checklist:
Track per task:
Example tracking:
Task: Implement user login
Model: Sonnet
Tokens: ~5k input, ~2k output
Retries: 1 (initial implementation had auth bug)
Time: 8 minutes
Outcome: Success
Alternatives
affaan-m/ECC
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.
affaan-m/ECC
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
affaan-m/ECC
Use it for engineering tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program