github/awesome-copilot/skills/postgresql-code-review/SKILL.md
postgresql-code-review
PostgreSQL-specific code review assistant focusing on PostgreSQL best practices, anti-patterns, and unique quality standards. Covers JSONB operations, array usage, custom types, schema design, function optimization, and PostgreSQL-exclusive security features like Row Level Security (RLS).
- Source repository stars
- 37,126
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-28
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Expert PostgreSQL code review for ${selection} (or entire project if no selection). Focus on PostgreSQL-specific best practices, anti-patterns, and quality standards that are unique to PostgreSQL.
Not for
- Performance Anti-Patterns
- Schema Design Issues
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/postgresql-code-review"Inspect the Agent Skill "postgresql-code-review" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/postgresql-code-review/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
🎯 PostgreSQL-Specific Review Areas
Review the “🎯 PostgreSQL-Specific Review Areas” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “🎯 PostgreSQL-Specific Review Areas” source section. - 02
Array Operations Review
Review the “Array Operations Review” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Array Operations Review” source section. - 03
PostgreSQL Schema Design Review
Review the “PostgreSQL Schema Design Review” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “PostgreSQL Schema Design Review” source section. - 04
📊 PostgreSQL Extension Usage Review
Review the “📊 PostgreSQL Extension Usage Review” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “📊 PostgreSQL Extension Usage Review” source section. - 05
🛡️ PostgreSQL Security Review
Review the “🛡️ PostgreSQL Security Review” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “🛡️ PostgreSQL Security Review” source section.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 85/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 37,126 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- github/awesome-copilot
- Skill path
- skills/postgresql-code-review/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
PostgreSQL Code Review Assistant
Expert PostgreSQL code review for ${selection} (or entire project if no selection). Focus on PostgreSQL-specific best practices, anti-patterns, and quality standards that are unique to PostgreSQL.
🎯 PostgreSQL-Specific Review Areas
JSONB Best Practices
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient JSONB usage
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE data->>'status' = 'shipped'; -- No index support
-- ✅ GOOD: Indexable JSONB queries
CREATE INDEX idx_orders_status ON orders USING gin((data->'status'));
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE data @> '{"status": "shipped"}';
-- ❌ BAD: Deep nesting without consideration
UPDATE orders SET data = data || '{"shipping":{"tracking":{"number":"123"}}}';
-- ✅ GOOD: Structured JSONB with validation
ALTER TABLE orders ADD CONSTRAINT valid_status
CHECK (data->>'status' IN ('pending', 'shipped', 'delivered'));
Array Operations Review
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient array operations
SELECT * FROM products WHERE 'electronics' = ANY(categories); -- No index
-- ✅ GOOD: GIN indexed array queries
CREATE INDEX idx_products_categories ON products USING gin(categories);
SELECT * FROM products WHERE categories @> ARRAY['electronics'];
-- ❌ BAD: Array concatenation in loops
-- This would be inefficient in a function/procedure
-- ✅ GOOD: Bulk array operations
UPDATE products SET categories = categories || ARRAY['new_category']
WHERE id IN (SELECT id FROM products WHERE condition);
PostgreSQL Schema Design Review
-- ❌ BAD: Not using PostgreSQL features
CREATE TABLE users (
id INTEGER,
email VARCHAR(255),
created_at TIMESTAMP
);
-- ✅ GOOD: PostgreSQL-optimized schema
CREATE TABLE users (
id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
email CITEXT UNIQUE NOT NULL, -- Case-insensitive email
created_at TIMESTAMPTZ DEFAULT NOW(),
metadata JSONB DEFAULT '{}',
CONSTRAINT valid_email CHECK (email ~* '^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$')
);
-- Add JSONB GIN index for metadata queries
CREATE INDEX idx_users_metadata ON users USING gin(metadata);
Custom Types and Domains
-- ❌ BAD: Using generic types for specific data
CREATE TABLE transactions (
amount DECIMAL(10,2),
currency VARCHAR(3),
status VARCHAR(20)
);
-- ✅ GOOD: PostgreSQL custom types
CREATE TYPE currency_code AS ENUM ('USD', 'EUR', 'GBP', 'JPY');
CREATE TYPE transaction_status AS ENUM ('pending', 'completed', 'failed', 'cancelled');
CREATE DOMAIN positive_amount AS DECIMAL(10,2) CHECK (VALUE > 0);
CREATE TABLE transactions (
amount positive_amount NOT NULL,
currency currency_code NOT NULL,
status transaction_status DEFAULT 'pending'
);
🔍 PostgreSQL-Specific Anti-Patterns
Performance Anti-Patterns
- Avoiding PostgreSQL-specific indexes: Not using GIN/GiST for appropriate data types
- Misusing JSONB: Treating JSONB like a simple string field
- Ignoring array operators: Using inefficient array operations
- Poor partition key selection: Not leveraging PostgreSQL partitioning effectively
Schema Design Issues
- Not using ENUM types: Using VARCHAR for limited value sets
- Ignoring constraints: Missing CHECK constraints for data validation
- Wrong data types: Using VARCHAR instead of TEXT or CITEXT
- Missing JSONB structure: Unstructured JSONB without validation
Function and Trigger Issues
-- ❌ BAD: Inefficient trigger function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_modified_time()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
NEW.updated_at = NOW(); -- Should use TIMESTAMPTZ
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
-- ✅ GOOD: Optimized trigger function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_modified_time()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
NEW.updated_at = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
-- Set trigger to fire only when needed
CREATE TRIGGER update_modified_time_trigger
BEFORE UPDATE ON table_name
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (OLD.* IS DISTINCT FROM NEW.*)
EXECUTE FUNCTION update_modified_time();
📊 PostgreSQL Extension Usage Review
Extension Best Practices
-- ✅ Check if extension exists before creating
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "uuid-ossp";
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pgcrypto";
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "pg_trgm";
-- ✅ Use extensions appropriately
-- UUID generation
SELECT uuid_generate_v4();
-- Password hashing
SELECT crypt('password', gen_salt('bf'));
-- Fuzzy text matching
SELECT word_similarity('postgres', 'postgre');
🛡️ PostgreSQL Security Review
Row Level Security (RLS)
-- ✅ GOOD: Implementing RLS
ALTER TABLE sensitive_data ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
CREATE POLICY user_data_policy ON sensitive_data
FOR ALL TO application_role
USING (user_id = current_setting('app.current_user_id')::INTEGER);
Privilege Management
-- ❌ BAD: Overly broad permissions
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public TO app_user;
-- ✅ GOOD: Granular permissions
GRANT SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE ON specific_table TO app_user;
GRANT USAGE ON SEQUENCE specific_table_id_seq TO app_user;
🎯 PostgreSQL Code Quality Checklist
Schema Design
- Using appropriate PostgreSQL data types (CITEXT, JSONB, arrays)
- Leveraging ENUM types for constrained values
- Implementing proper CHECK constraints
- Using TIMESTAMPTZ instead of TIMESTAMP
- Defining custom domains for reusable constraints
Performance Considerations
- Appropriate index types (GIN for JSONB/arrays, GiST for ranges)
- JSONB queries using containment operators (@>, ?)
- Array operations using PostgreSQL-specific operators
- Proper use of window functions and CTEs
- Efficient use of PostgreSQL-specific functions
PostgreSQL Features Utilization
- Using extensions where appropriate
- Implementing stored procedures in PL/pgSQL when beneficial
- Leveraging PostgreSQL's advanced SQL features
- Using PostgreSQL-specific optimization techniques
- Implementing proper error handling in functions
Security and Compliance
- Row Level Security (RLS) implementation where needed
- Proper role and privilege management
- Using PostgreSQL's built-in encryption functions
- Implementing audit trails with PostgreSQL features
📝 PostgreSQL-Specific Review Guidelines
- Data Type Optimization: Ensure PostgreSQL-specific types are used appropriately
- Index Strategy: Review index types and ensure PostgreSQL-specific indexes are utilized
- JSONB Structure: Validate JSONB schema design and query patterns
- Function Quality: Review PL/pgSQL functions for efficiency and best practices
- Extension Usage: Verify appropriate use of PostgreSQL extensions
- Performance Features: Check utilization of PostgreSQL's advanced features
- Security Implementation: Review PostgreSQL-specific security features
Focus on PostgreSQL's unique capabilities and ensure the code leverages what makes PostgreSQL special rather than treating it as a generic SQL database.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
suede-workflow-skills
Umbrella workflow for 67 public skills: Full Send, copy, design, code review, SEO, launch packaging, MCP QA, iOS and Android app shipping, and creator workflows. Loads the full public skill pack.
github/awesome-copilot
copilot-pr-autopilot
Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
suede-code-review
Find the bugs a diff can actually ship: TypeScript, React, Next.js, OWASP, accessibility, SEO, database, and deploy-risk review. Return findings, not a grade.
LazyAGI/LazyMind
ui-secure-review
Review frontend and UI changes for concrete security risks such as XSS, unsafe URL handling, token leakage, missing origin checks, and client-side authorization gaps. Use when users ask for a UI code review focused on safety and reliability.