affaan-m/ECC/skills/skill-comply/SKILL.md
skill-comply
Visualize whether skills, rules, and agent definitions are actually followed — auto-generates scenarios at 3 prompt strictness levels, runs agents, classifies behavioral sequences, and reports compliance rates with full tool call timelines
- Source repository stars
- 234,327
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-27
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Measures whether coding agents actually follow skills, rules, or agent definitions by: 1. Auto-generating expected behavioral sequences (specs) from any .md file 2. Auto-generating scenarios with decreasing prompt strictness (supportive → neutral → competing) 3. Running claude -…
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/skill-comply"Inspect the Agent Skill "skill-comply" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/skills/skill-comply/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Usage
Review the “Usage” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Usage” source section. - 02
Supported Targets
Skills (skills//SKILL.md): Workflow skills like search-first, TDD guides
Skills (skills//SKILL.md): Workflow skills like search-first, TDD guidesRules (rules/common/.md): Mandatory rules like testing.md, security.md, git-workflow.mdAgent definitions (agents/.md): Whether an agent gets invoked when expected (internal workflow verification not yet supported) - 03
When to Activate
User runs /skill-comply
User runs /skill-complyUser asks "is this rule actually being followed?"After adding new rules/skills, to verify agent compliance - 04
Full run
uv run python -m scripts.run /.claude/rules/common/testing.md
uv run python -m scripts.run /.claude/rules/common/testing.md
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 75/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 234,327 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- affaan-m/ECC
- Skill path
- skills/skill-comply/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
skill-comply: Automated Compliance Measurement
Measures whether coding agents actually follow skills, rules, or agent definitions by:
- Auto-generating expected behavioral sequences (specs) from any .md file
- Auto-generating scenarios with decreasing prompt strictness (supportive → neutral → competing)
- Running
claude -pand capturing tool call traces via stream-json - Classifying tool calls against spec steps using LLM (not regex)
- Checking temporal ordering deterministically
- Generating self-contained reports with spec, prompts, and timelines
Supported Targets
- Skills (
skills/*/SKILL.md): Workflow skills like search-first, TDD guides - Rules (
rules/common/*.md): Mandatory rules like testing.md, security.md, git-workflow.md - Agent definitions (
agents/*.md): Whether an agent gets invoked when expected (internal workflow verification not yet supported)
When to Activate
- User runs
/skill-comply <path> - User asks "is this rule actually being followed?"
- After adding new rules/skills, to verify agent compliance
- Periodically as part of quality maintenance
Usage
# Full run
uv run python -m scripts.run ~/.claude/rules/common/testing.md
# Dry run (no cost, spec + scenarios only)
uv run python -m scripts.run --dry-run ~/.claude/skills/search-first/SKILL.md
# Custom models
uv run python -m scripts.run --gen-model haiku --model sonnet <path>
Key Concept: Prompt Independence
Measures whether a skill/rule is followed even when the prompt doesn't explicitly support it.
Report Contents
Reports are self-contained and include:
- Expected behavioral sequence (auto-generated spec)
- Scenario prompts (what was asked at each strictness level)
- Compliance scores per scenario
- Tool call timelines with LLM classification labels
Advanced (optional)
For users familiar with hooks, reports also include hook promotion recommendations for steps with low compliance. This is informational — the main value is the compliance visibility itself.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
affaan-m/ECC
skill-comply
Review skill-comply's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
affaan-m/ECC
skill-comply
Review skill-comply's use cases, installation, workflow, and original source instructions.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
churn-prevention
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o