Source profileQuality 75/100

affaan-m/ECC/skills/skill-comply/SKILL.md

skill-comply

Visualize whether skills, rules, and agent definitions are actually followed — auto-generates scenarios at 3 prompt strictness levels, runs agents, classifies behavioral sequences, and reports compliance rates with full tool call timelines

Source repository stars
234,327
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-27
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Measures whether coding agents actually follow skills, rules, or agent definitions by: 1. Auto-generating expected behavioral sequences (specs) from any .md file 2. Auto-generating scenarios with decreasing prompt strictness (supportive → neutral → competing) 3. Running claude -…

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/skill-comply"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "skill-comply" from https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/blob/4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38/skills/skill-comply/SKILL.md at commit 4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Usage

      Review the “Usage” section in the pinned source before continuing.

      Review and apply the “Usage” source section.
    2. 02

      Supported Targets

      Skills (skills//SKILL.md): Workflow skills like search-first, TDD guides

      Skills (skills//SKILL.md): Workflow skills like search-first, TDD guidesRules (rules/common/.md): Mandatory rules like testing.md, security.md, git-workflow.mdAgent definitions (agents/.md): Whether an agent gets invoked when expected (internal workflow verification not yet supported)
    3. 03

      When to Activate

      User runs /skill-comply

      User runs /skill-complyUser asks "is this rule actually being followed?"After adding new rules/skills, to verify agent compliance
    4. 04

      Full run

      uv run python -m scripts.run /.claude/rules/common/testing.md

      uv run python -m scripts.run /.claude/rules/common/testing.md

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score75/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars234,327SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    affaan-m/ECC
    Skill path
    skills/skill-comply/SKILL.md
    Commit
    4e973d3eaf92d97f8d2e2d8abb39d8bdc8711b38
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    skill-comply: Automated Compliance Measurement

    Measures whether coding agents actually follow skills, rules, or agent definitions by:

    1. Auto-generating expected behavioral sequences (specs) from any .md file
    2. Auto-generating scenarios with decreasing prompt strictness (supportive → neutral → competing)
    3. Running claude -p and capturing tool call traces via stream-json
    4. Classifying tool calls against spec steps using LLM (not regex)
    5. Checking temporal ordering deterministically
    6. Generating self-contained reports with spec, prompts, and timelines

    Supported Targets

    • Skills (skills/*/SKILL.md): Workflow skills like search-first, TDD guides
    • Rules (rules/common/*.md): Mandatory rules like testing.md, security.md, git-workflow.md
    • Agent definitions (agents/*.md): Whether an agent gets invoked when expected (internal workflow verification not yet supported)

    When to Activate

    • User runs /skill-comply <path>
    • User asks "is this rule actually being followed?"
    • After adding new rules/skills, to verify agent compliance
    • Periodically as part of quality maintenance

    Usage

    # Full run
    uv run python -m scripts.run ~/.claude/rules/common/testing.md
    
    # Dry run (no cost, spec + scenarios only)
    uv run python -m scripts.run --dry-run ~/.claude/skills/search-first/SKILL.md
    
    # Custom models
    uv run python -m scripts.run --gen-model haiku --model sonnet <path>
    

    Key Concept: Prompt Independence

    Measures whether a skill/rule is followed even when the prompt doesn't explicitly support it.

    Report Contents

    Reports are self-contained and include:

    1. Expected behavioral sequence (auto-generated spec)
    2. Scenario prompts (what was asked at each strictness level)
    3. Compliance scores per scenario
    4. Tool call timelines with LLM classification labels

    Advanced (optional)

    For users familiar with hooks, reports also include hook promotion recommendations for steps with low compliance. This is informational — the main value is the compliance visibility itself.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing